Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Article

The Legal Status of Aboriginal Spiritual Beliefs

Ernst Willheim*

ANU College of Law, Australian National University, Australia

*Corresponding Author:
Ernst Willheim
ANU College of Law
Australian National University, Australia
Tel: 6126125 2144
E-mail: ernst1@iinet.net.au

Received Date: June 04, 2014; Accepted Date: July 15, 2014; Published Date: July 17, 2014

Citation: Willheim E (2014) The Legal Status of Aboriginal Spiritual Beliefs. J Civil Legal Sci 3:127. doi:10.4172/2169-0170.1000127

Copyright: © 2014 Willheim E. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

What should be the legal status of Aboriginal spiritual belief, for example, rights and obligations under Aboriginal spiritual beliefs to access land to conduct traditional ceremony. Conventional common law property rights do not ordinarily extend to protection of spiritual beliefs. The article contends, however, that where common law and statutory law recognizes a system of native title, the content of native title is to be found not in the traditional principles of the common law but in the relevant native title traditions and customs. Spiritual elements, including rights and obligations to access sacred sites for traditional ceremony may be an integral component of native title. The issue is illustrated by analysis and rejection of the Commonwealth’s argument in a High Court case.

Keywords

Top