Smart Ageing International Research Center, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
Visit for more related articles at International Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience
Three years have passed since the earthquake, in the coastal areas in the disaster area, by population transfer or the like from the temporary housing, the importance of the regeneration and revitalization of the local community has been pointed out. This study performed a preliminary study to aim at the psychological inspection about an effect of the horticultural therapy as the means of the local community reproduction support of the disaster area. Forty five women who are living in the coastal area of Miyagi Prefecture participated in this study. They experienced the Great East Japan earthquake in 2011 and suffered some kind of damage caused by the earthquake. The participants were assigned to two groups, the intervention group and the control group, via a random draw using a computer. The HI group attended the horticultural therapy intervention (HT intervention) sessions for 16 weeks. The HT intervention was designed in collaboration with a horticultural therapist and clinical psychologists. This intervention comprised a total of 16 weekly sessions (120 min each) at the community center and 15 minutes per day at participants? homes. We used five psychological measures for an intervention evaluation. The HI group showed a significant increase in post- intervention SCI-2 total scores, post- intervention SCI-2 membership scores, post- intervention SCI-2 influence scores, post- intervention SCI-2 meeting needs scores, post- intervention SCI-2 shared emotional connection scores, and post-intervention RSES score. We believe that these results suggest the effectiveness of the horticultural therapy as the means of the local community reproduction.
Disaster area, regional community, earthquake victims, horticultural therapy, community consciousness, self-esteem
Three years after the Great East Japan earthquake, it begins to work for the full-scale reconstruction of the disaster area. In particular, many people in the coastal area of the disaster area started to settle in a hill and collective relocation from temporary housing. Therefore, importance of regeneration and revitalization of the local community of a new disaster area has been pointed out. As a way of regeneration and revitalization of local community of a new disaster area, we have focused on horticultural therapy.
Horticultural therapy (HT) is a method of psychological care for treating post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that was developed in the United States after World War II for the psychological care and social rehabilitation of disabled soldiers and war veterans showing PTSD symptoms (Detweiler et al., 2010). HT interventions are led by professionals trained to incorporate the use of plants and horticultural education into rehabilitation therapies (Detweiler et al., 2010). It has been reported that participants begin to identify with plant growth, and regain health and motivation. Through such experiences and their association with nature, participants are thought to experience improvement (Haller and Kramer, 2006). About the effectiveness of horticultural therapy for mild symptoms of PTSD caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake, previous studies of our group has demonstrated that there is effective intervention by a study of victims with mild PTSD symptom (Kotozaki, 2013a; Kotozaki, 2013b; Kotozaki, 2014). In the next stage of our research, we will conduct in the medium- to long-term about the effect of horticultural therapy as a means of local community regeneration or support in the disaster area and we are aim is to establish a methodology of horticultural therapy as a regional community regeneration or support available in the disaster area.
The purpose of this study was to conduct a preliminary experiment prior to more extensive experiment for women in the coastal area of the disaster area and we examine the psychological change pre- and post- intervention.
Forty five women who living certain region in the coastal area of Miyagi Prefecture participated in this study (mean age: 46.53 ± 8.40 years old). They experienced the Great East Japan earthquake in 2011 and suffered some kind of damage caused by the earthquake. All participants were right-handed working native Japanese speakers who had no serious mental disorder. Written informed consent was obtained from each subject in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1991). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tohoku University School of Medicine.
The study was a randomized, double-blind, controlled, crossover trial that was registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000006170). The participants were assigned to two groups, the intervention group (HorticulturalIntervention [HI] group; n=22) and the control group (No Intervention [NI] group; n=23), via a random draw using a computer. The HI group attended the horticultural therapyintervention (HT intervention) sessions for 16 weeks. The HT intervention was designed in collaboration with a horticultural therapist and clinical psychologists. A horticultural therapist carried out the main instruction, and the Clinical psychologists were the part of support of a Horticultural therapist. This intervention comprised a total of 16 weekly sessions (120 min each) at the communitycenter and 15 minutes per day at participants’ homes. The sessions at the community center were comprised of interactive lectures and practical horticultural training. The participants then attended six horticultural lessons, including topics such as designing a garden planter, seeding, watering, weeding, and picking flowers. We really carried in combination these out every time. Participants filled out an HT intervention session checklist after each session as a self-assessment. Participants took care of plants for 15 min per day at their convenience with horticulture kits provided by the experimenters, and recorded the completion of this task daily on forms provided by the experimenters at the intervention sessions. On the other hands, the NI group did not undergo horticultural intervention and engaged in regular life over the 16 weeks. All participants underwent psychological measurements, both on the first day and at 16 weeks after the start of the intervention. This study design used a design same as our previous study (Kotozaki, 2013a, 2013b, 2014; Kotozaki et al., 2014).
Sense of Community Index 2 (SCI-2)
To measure of sense of community, we used the SCI-2 (Chavis et al., 2008). This index consists of 24 items and a perception with four elements: membership, influence, meeting needs, and a shared emotional connection. The coefficient alpha of the SCI-2 is 0.94 and subscale proved to be reliable with coefficient alpha scores of 0.79 to 0.80 (Chavis et al., 2008). The SCI-2 was administered pre- and post- intervention.
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES)
To assess self-esteem, we used the RSES (Rosenberg, 1965; Mimura & Griffiths, 2007). This scale consists of 10 items and is evaluated in four grades (Rosenberg, 1965). It can be said that the higher your test score is, the self-esteem is high. The RSES was administered pre- and post- intervention.
The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)
To assess general health, we used the GHQ (Goldberg, 1972; Nakagawa & Daibo, 1981). This scale consists of 30 items and uses a four-point Likert scoring method. The GHQ was administered pre- and post- intervention.
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depressive Symptoms Scale (CES-D)
To assess depression symptoms, we used the CES-D (Radloff, 1977; Shima et al., 1985). This scale consists of 20-item. Scores for each item are summed to give a range of total scores from 0 to 60. A higher score indicates a greater tendency toward depressive symptoms. A score of 16 points or higher suggests the presence of clinical depressive symptoms. The CES-D was administered pre- and post- intervention.
The data were analyzed using PASW statistical software (ver. 18 for Windows; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way analysis of covariance was conducted with differences between the pre- and post- intervention scores included as dependent variables and pretest scores as covariates for each psychological measure. Because our primary point of interest was the beneficial effect of intervention training, test–retest changes were compared between the HI and NI groups using one-tailed tests (p<0.05), in the same manner as in previous studies (Kotozaki, 2013a, 2013b, 2014; Kotozaki et al., 2014).
Table 1 shows the comparisons of pre- and post- intervention psychological changes between the two groups. The HI group showed a significant increase in post- intervention SCI-2 total scores (F[1,43]=6.66, p<0.01), post- intervention SCI-2 membership scores (F[1,43]=7.57, p<0.01), post- intervention SCI-2 influence scores (F[1,43] = 14.46, p<0.01), post- intervention SCI-2 meeting needs scores (F[1, 43] = 8.94, p<0.01), post- intervention SCI-2 shared emotional connection scores (F[1,43]=2.99, p<0.05), and post-intervention RSES score (F[1,37] = 3.18, p<0.05).
|HI group||NI group|
|SCI-2 total||49.09 ± 12.84||56.95 ± 9.41||54.04 ± 14.94||52.78 ± 15.96||0.007|
|SCI-2 membership||11.18 ± 3.80||13.86 ± 2.42||12.96 ± 3.72||12.83 ± 4.15||0.005|
|SCI-2 influence||11.64 ± 2.75||14.68 ± 3.26||13.40 ± 3.80||12.70 ± 3.70||0.001|
|SCI-2 meeting needs||15.50 ± 3.36||16.18 ± 3.62||14.00 ± 4.11||13.78 ± 4.07||0.003|
|SCI-2 shared emotional connection||12.77 ± 4.40||14.45 ± 4.00||13.78 ± 4.54||13.09 ± 4.69||0.046|
|RSES||30.95 ± 3.30||32.36 ± 3.92||32.43 ± 3.78||32.04 ± 3.39||0.041|
|GHQ||4.82 ± 4.60||2.14 ± 3.52||6.52 ± 6.71||4.87 ± 6.76||0.086|
|CES-D||7.59 ± 4.62||4.41 ± 4.34||10.57 ± 7.46||8.96 ± 7.88||0.154|
Table 1: Comparisons of Pre- and Post- Intervention Psychological Changes
This study was to conduct a preliminary experiment prior to more extensive experiment for women in the coastal area of the disaster area and we examine the psychological change pre- and post- intervention. As a result, the HI group showed significantly increased post-intervention community consciousness score and self-esteem score.
As for improving community consciousness, previous study reported that horticultural activity may be a useful tool for community based programs (Chalker-Scott & Collman, 2006; Hayashi et al., 2008). Additionally, previous studies suggested that the emotional intelligence improved by HT (Kim & Park, 2010; Park & Huh, 2010; Kotozaki, 2014). In this intervention, people in the HI group took horticultural-related lessons together and done horticultural activities each time. We think that they can be improved new communication skills and interpersonal relationship skills because this intervention was a long term and they have performed together. Therefore, we also think that their community awareness improved.
In the result of this study, self-esteem of people in the HI group has also improved after the intervention. Some previous studies suggest that the HT improved self-esteem (Williams & Mattson, 1988; Martin-Yates, 1990; Gigliotti et al., 2004; Mattson et al., 2004; Um et al., 2002; Clatworthy et al., 2013). Additionally, self-esteem was suggested to be a preventive factor for PTSD and factors that predict the recovery of changes in brain morphology (Sekiguchi et al., 2014). We think that it overlaps with one's growth to bring up a plant and it will feel confident about oneself by bringing up a plant. We also think that PTSD symptoms have gotten quite better by self-esteem is improved.
From the above results, it can be said that it can be said that it has can indicate the effectiveness of horticultural therapy as a method of improving the local community consciousness by our intervention. In the future, we will move forward with full-scale experience in the disaster area and will address the impact of regeneration and revitalization of local community.
The authors thank Mayu Fujita, Megumi Togashi, Ayaka Sato, Natsumi Shimamura, Rei Takamatsu, Mami Ishikawa, Masumi Kanno, Megumi Saito, and Misaki Ouchi for assisting with psychological testing. We also appreciate the contribution of Mrs. Taeko Shishido, a horticultural therapist who provided advice during the preparation of the intervention program. Dr. Y.K. was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (KAKENHI 24730566, 24790653) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan.
Asukai, N., Tsuruta, N., & Saito, A. (2003). Psychometric properties of the Japanese-language version of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-IV. Japanese Journal of Traumatic Stress, 1, 47-53.
Blake, D. D, Weathers, F. W., Nagy, L. M., Kaloupek, D. G., Gusman, F. D., et al. (1995) The development of a clinician-administered PTSD scale. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8, 75-90.
Chalker-Scott, L., & Collman, S. J. (2006). Washington State's Master Gardener program: Thirty years of leadership in university-sponsored, volunteer-coordinated, sustainable community horticulture. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 988-993.
Chavis, D. M., Lee, K. S., & Acosta, J. D. (2008). The Sense of Community (SCI) Revised: The Reliability and Validity of the SCI-2. Paper presented at the 2nd International Community Psychology Conference, Lisboa, Portugal.
Clatworthy, J., Hinds, J., & Camic, P. M. (2013). Gardening as a mental health intervention: a review. Mental Health Review Journal, 18, 214-225.
Detweiler, M. B., Sharma, T., Lane, S., Kim, M., Johnson, B. C., & Kim, K. Y. (2010). Practitioner forum: The case for using restorative natural environments in veterans’ rehabilitation programs. Federal Practitioner, 1, 26-28.
Gigliotti, C. M., Jarrott, S. E., & Yorgason, J. (2004). Harvesting Health Effects of Three Types of Horticultural Therapy Activities for Persons with Dementia. Dementia, 3, 161-180.
Goldberg, D. (1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. London: Oxford University Press. pp.156.
Haller, R., & Kramer, C. (Eds.) (2006). Horticultural therapy methods: Making connections in health care, human service, and community programs. Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press.
Hayashi, N., Wada, T., Hirai, H., Miyake, T., Matsuura, Y., Shimizu, N., et al. (2008). The effects of horticultural activity in a community garden on mood changes. Environment Control in Biology, 46, 233-240.
Kim, H. Y., & Park, Y. H. (2010). Effect of Horticultural Therapy on the Self-Efficacy and Emotional Intelligence of Children in the Child Welfare Institutions. Journal of Korean Society People Plants Environment , 13, 7-11.
Kotozaki, Y. (2013a). The Psychological Effect of Horticultural Therapy Intervention on Earthquake-Related Stress in Women of Earthquake-Related Areas. Journal of Translational Medicine & Epidemiology, 1, 1008.
Kotozaki, Y. (2013b). The psychological changes of horticultural therapy intervention for elderly women of earthquake-related areas. Journal of Trauma & Treatment, 3, 184. doi:10.4172/2167-1222.1000184
Kotozaki, Y. (2014). The comparison of the effects of individual intervention and group intervention in horticulture intervention. Health Care Current Reviews, 2, 120. doi: 10.4172/hccr.1000120
Martin-Yates, T. (1990). A comparison of the eﬀects of horticultural therapy and pet therapy on self-esteem and wellbeing of adults with visual disabilities. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 5, 47–58.
Mattson, R. H., Kim, E., Marlowe, G. E., & Nicholson, J. D. (2004). Horticultural Therapy Improves Vocational Skills, Self-esteem, and Environmental Awareness of Criminal Offenders in a Community Corrections Setting. HortScience, 39, 837-837.
Mimura, C., & Griffiths, P. (2007). A Japanese version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Translation and equivalence assessment. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 62, 589-594.
Nakagawa, Y., & Daibo, I. (1966). Japanese version GHQ30 (in Japanese). Tokyo: Nihon Bunka Kagakusha.
Park, S. H., & Huh, M. R. (2010). Effects of a horticultural program on the preschool children's emotional intelligence and daily stress. Korean Journal of Horticultural Science & Technology, 28, 144-149.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Sekiguchi, A., Kotozaki, Y., Sugiura, M., Nouchi, R., Takeuchi, H., Hanawa, S., et al. (2014). Resilience after 3/11: structural brain changes 1 year after the Japanese earthquake. Molecular psychiatry, doi: 10.1038/mp.2014.28.
Shima, S., Shikano, T., Kitamura, T., & Asai, M. (1985). New self-rating scale for depression (in Japanese). Clinical Psychiatry, 27, 717-723.
Um, S. J., Kim, S. Y., Song, J. E., Kwack, H. R., & Son, K. C. (2002). Effect of horticultural therapy on the changes of self-esteem and sociality of individuals with chronic schizophrenia. In XXVI International Horticultural Congress: Expanding Roles for Horticulture in Improving Human Well-Being and Life Quality 639 (pp. 185-191).
Williams, P. N., & Mattson, R. H. (1988). Horticultural activities and demographic factors inﬂuence children’s self-esteem. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 3, 39–54.