alexa Knowledge, Attitude and Perception about HIV/AIDS among the Wives of Migrant Workers of Muzaffarpur District in Bihar | Open Access Journals
ISSN: 2161-0711
Journal of Community Medicine & Health Education
Like us on:
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700+ peer reviewed, Open Access Journals that operates with the help of 50,000+ Editorial Board Members and esteemed reviewers and 1000+ Scientific associations in Medical, Clinical, Pharmaceutical, Engineering, Technology and Management Fields.
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events with over 600+ Conferences, 1200+ Symposiums and 1200+ Workshops on
Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business

Knowledge, Attitude and Perception about HIV/AIDS among the Wives of Migrant Workers of Muzaffarpur District in Bihar

Alok Ranjan1*, Giridhara R Babu2 and Roger Detels3

1Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India

2Public Health Foundation of India, IIPH-H, Bangalore Campus, SIHFW Premises, Beside Leprosy Hospital, 1st Cross, Magadi Road, Bangalore, India

3Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Alok Ranjan
Assistant Professor, Department of Community and Family Medicine
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Phulwarisharif
Patna-801 505, Bihar, India
Tel: +91-9471007028
E-mail: [email protected]

Received Date: July 27, 2015 Accepted Date: August 13, 2015 Published Date: August 17, 2015

Citation: Ranjan A, Babu GR, Detels R (2015) Knowledge, Attitude and Perception about HIV/AIDS among the Wives of Migrant Workers of Muzaffarpur District in Bihar. J Community Med Health Educ 5:361. doi:10.4172/2161-0711.1000361

Copyright: © 2015 Ranjan A, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Visit for more related articles at Journal of Community Medicine & Health Education

Abstract

Background: There is limited evidence on the knowledge, attitude and risk perception related to HIV/AIDS among the wives of migrant workers in India.
Method: We conducted this study in 850 wives of migrant workers in age group of 15-45 years were selected randomly from 34 out of 1811 villages using two-stage cluster sampling method. A total of 132 wives of migrant workers who reported prior awareness about HIV/AIDS, were interviewed.
Result: Only 16% wives of migrant workers had ever heard of HIV of whom 72% had correct knowledge such as condoms provide protection from HIV (80%), sharing needle/syringe (91%), single sex-partner (75%) and blood test before transfusion (70%). The overall reliability coefficient (Cronbach’s alpha=0.78) of 18-items related to knowledge regarding transmission and prevention of HIV showed a high level of consistency of response. Nearly 85% of the wives perceived themselves and their husbands at very low level of risk of HIV infection. In addition, only 8 women had used condoms during sex with their husbands.
Conclusion: Intervention strategies in India should target wives of migrant workers, as well as their husbands for increasing HIV knowledge and awareness. Specifically, the wives of migrant workers need to be empowered appropriately perceiving the risk of infection and use of condoms.

Keywords

Migrant workers; HIV knowledge; HIV risk perception; India

Introduction

The official estimates of HIV cases in India reached 2.39 million in the year 2010 of whom 39% were women amounting to 0.93 million of the total [1]. Despite of the decline in overall disease prevalence during the period 2000-09, the prevalence among women continued to remain high [2,3]. Several socio-economic factors predispose Indian women for acquiring HIV/AIDS infection [4,5]. These include early marriage, illiteracy, financial dependence, violence and sexual abuse against women [6,7]. A large proportion of the women have poor access to information and education [8]. It is also suggested that knowledge of HIV is greater in better educated and from higher socio-economic classes compared to among the general population [9].

The National Family Health Survey, Phase-3, conducted by the Ministry of Health in India reported low level of knowledge about HIV infection among women as one of the factors promoting spread of HIV infection [10,11]. Earlier reports indicate that empowerment of women is fundamental in HIV/AIDS prevention in India [4]. The studies indicate that the risk for women was high in young and poor urban widows, as well as in those who have suffered sexual violence [4].

The HIV epidemic in India varies from state to state and across special population groups. Specifically, there is no evidence available regarding sexual behavior and risk profile among married women of migrant workers. We explored knowledge, attitude and risk perception related to HIV/AIDS among the wives of migrant workers, and in-depth investigations among those who had prior information about HIV/AIDS, using structured interviews assessing interpersonal, social and cultural context of the reported behaviors.

Methods

A community based cross-sectional survey was conducted among 15-45 years old wives of migrant male workers living in Muzaffarpur district, Bihar for at least six months, and without any known cognitive disability. The study population consisted of married woman who led a conjugal life for at least one month and had sexual contacts whenever their husbands were available. This sample comprised of wives of migrant male workers of Muzaffarpur district in Bihar, India during 2012-13. Two-stage cluster sampling method was used taking village as cluster and eligible wives as the secondary unit. Out of 1811 villages in the district, 34 villages were selected as primary sampling unit (PSU), and from each cluster 25 wives of migrant workers were selected randomly from a sampling frame of migrant worker households in each village. A pre-tested structured questionnaire was administered to all 850 wives for collecting the basic information. Trained female investigators conducted face-to-face interview to know whether women heard about HIV/AIDS before this interview or not. Finally, a total of 132 wives of migrant workers, who reported prior awareness about HIV/AIDS during the survey, were interviewed for HIV/AIDS-related knowledge, attitude and risk perceptions.

Knowledge was assessed using an 18-item question, which included knowledge on ways of getting infection, myths, treatment and prevention of HIV/AIDS. The responses were binary variable (Yes or No). Attitude was assessed using a 16-item question towards HIV/AIDS and with HIV/AIDS patients. It was a 3-scale question (Agree, partially agree and disagree). Risk perception was assessed on the basis of a 4-item question about women and theirs husband. Risk behaviours were also assessed.

Ethical issues

The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Institutional Review Board approved this study (IRB#11-000341; Version: G09-08-032-01; date - 04/01/2011).

Statistical analysis

The data was analyzed using Stata version10 (Stata Corp, Houstan, Texas, USA). Firstly univariate analysis was conducted for each variable to find missing observations or non-responded items in the given data set. Earlier in the course of the survey, we took all efforts to minimize missing values and repeating the interviews in all villages again for those individual records showing missing values. Variables for correct response of items related to Knowledge about HIV transmission and prevention, and adding up raw score as created attitude responded during the interview for measuring the correct knowledge and attitude. We performed factor analysis using the extraction by principal component method and varimax rotation for measuring knowledge of and attitude towards HIV of the wives who had reported knowledge about HIV/AIDS [12]. First we checked whether the data is suitable for factor analysis or not using Kaise-Meyer-Olkin Measure of sampling adequacy, and Bartlett’s test of spherecity, which is a chi-square test. These two conditions were adequate for applying factor analysis for all three construct. Cronbach’s alpha was computed for knowledge items related to transmission and prevention and for attitude in order to measure the reliability and consistency of the items. We performed factor analysis separately for making assessment about “Knowledge related to transmission” based on 10-items and “knowledge related to prevention” based on 8-items in order to assess the unknown variables or factors.

Results

Knowledge of women regarding HIV/AIDS: Knowledge was assessed using 18-item questions, which included knowledge on ways of infection, myths, testing services, transmission, and prevention of HIV/AIDS. For knowledge, each right response was given a score of 1 while a wrong or unsure response was scored 0, so that the total scores could vary between 0-18. Knowledge scores from 0 to 10 were considered poor knowledge while knowledge scores more than 10 was considered good knowledge regarding HIV/AIDS. Overall, 110 (80%) of the women felt that HIV-infection could be avoided or one could protect oneself from getting HIV-infection. Seventy per cent had correct knowledge about vertical transmission, but only 32% had correct information about exclusive breast-feeding. On performing bivariate analysis using knowledge level with other socio-demographic and economic factors like age, educational status, religion, caste and living standard index of the women who responded about HIV. Overall, 72% of the respondents had good knowledge of HIV having total score more than 10. Except caste (subgroup within a religion), none of the demographic factors were found significantly associated with knowledge level about HIV/AIDS (chi square tests; p>0.05) (Table 1). The result of factor analysis for 8-items related to knowledge about prevention is presented in Table 2. Knowledge related to prevention, was explained by two factors, i.e. Factor-1 indicated response in favor of pertinent preventions whereas factor-2 indicated response in favor of not very pertinent prevention. Both these two factors had “eigenvalues” more than 1, and with 97% cumulative proportion of variance, thus satisfying the retention criteria of factors (Table 2). Further, the results showed that the first five items had reasonable loads on first factor, whereas last three items had reasonable load on factor-2. The reliability coefficient of 8-items variables in terms of Cronbach’s Alpha, was nearly 0.60, indicating a fair good level of consistency among the response of each items. However, high uniqueness values of each item are indication of low predictability of around 40%. (Not in table) The overall reliability coefficient of 18-items taken together was about 0.78, showing a high level of consistency of response related to knowledge regarding transmission and prevention of HIV.

Factors Knowledge Level Total (N) Mean ± SD p-value*
Good Knowledge (>10) n(%) Poor Knowledge (0-10)n(%)
All 95 (72) 37(28) 132 12 ± 2.45  
Median=12
IQR=10-14
Age group
15-24 42(79) 11(21) 53 12.35 ± 2.08 0.19
25-34 40(70) 17(30) 57 11.91 ± 2.52
35-49 13(62) 9 (38) 21 11.40 ± 2.87
Education
Literate 79(71) 32(29) 111 13.0 ± 2.37 0.39
Illiterate 16 (76) 5 (24) 21 12.2 ± 2.27
Religion
Hindu 82 (71) 34(29) 116 11.9 ± 2.37 0.14
Muslim 13 (81) 3 (19) 16 12.7 ± 2.04
Caste
General 2 (50) 2 (50) 4 10.75 ± 2.87 0.02  
OBC 64 (80) 16(20) 80 12.46 ± 2.21
SC 29 (60) 19 (40) 48 11.35 ± 2.37
Living Index
Low 66 (58) 48 (42) 114 11.97 ± 2.37 0.9  
Medium 10 (59) 7 (41) 17 12.0 ± 2.12
High 1 (100) 0 1 16

Table 1: Distribution of knowledge level and mean knowledge scores by socio-demographic and economic characteristics.

Factor Eigenvalues Difference Proportion Cumulative
Factor 1 1.5696 0.44818 0.5654 0.5654
Factor 2 1.21145 0.34341 0.4039 0.9639
Factor 3 0.778 0.67653 0.2802 1.2495
Factor 4 0.10152 0.16778 0.0366 1.2861

Table 2: Factor Analysis of 8-items questions pertaining to knowledge about prevention of HIV among wives of migrant workers.

Attitude of women towards HIV/AIDS

In order to assess the attitude of women towards HIV/AIDS, a set of 16-questions were asked on a 3 point-scale (agree, partial agree and disagree). Table 3 presents the distribution of responses of 132 women for each question pertaining to their attitude. The majority of the women (78%) believed that only immoral behavior of the persons put them at high risk of getting HIV infection. In order to get overall impression about the attitude of women based on 16-questions, responses were converted into raw score for assessing positive response, with having minimum score of 16 and maximum score of 48. The median score was 31 (Range: 22-37).

Statement Number responding (%) who agree or disagree with the statement
Agree (%) Partially Agree (%) Disagree (%)
1. People get HIV/AIDS due to Immoral behavior 103(78) 27(20.5) 2(1.5)
2. PLWAH have a right to decide who should know it 73 (55.3) 50(37.8) 9 (6.8)
3. Sex workers only women to worry about HIV 24 (18.2) 103 (78) 5 (3.8)
4. Men who go to sex workers or use drugs only men who have to worry about getting HIV/AIDS 84 (63.6) 47 (35.6) 1 (0.75)
5. Willing to take care of HIV Infected relatives 36 (27.4) 51 (38.6) 45 (34)
6. People with HIV/AIDS should continue living with their family 38 (28.8) 52 (39.4) 42 (31.8)
7. Sharing Meal with HIV infected person 43 (32.6) 55 (41.6) 34 (25.8)
8.Sending children to school with HIV-children 40 (30.3) 69 (52.3) 23 (17.4)
9. HIV infected teacher should continue teaching 42 (31.8) 64 (48.5) 26 (19.7)
10. Maintain secrecy of family member HIV-status 79 (60) 43 (32) 10(8)
11.Moving in a home with HIV-family neighbor 40 (30) 35 (26.5) 57 (43.2)
12. HIV/AIDS people shouldnot be allowed to continue their work 37 (28) 22 (16.6) 73 (55.4)
13. HIV/AIDS people shouldnot be allowed to participate social function 31 (23.5) 30 (22.7) 71 (53.8)
14. HIV/AIDS infected couple should not plan for the next pregnancy 99 (75.1) 22 (16.6) 11 (8.3)
15. HIV infected mother should notbreast feed 90 (68.2) 33 (25) 9 (6.8)
16. HIV/AIDS infected women should not be allowed for tattooing 53 (40.2) 63 (43.7) 16 (12.1)

Table 3: Distribution of correct attitude of wives of migrant workers of Muzaffarpur district towards HIV/AIDS.

We assumed that any values above median score of the total possible score can be considered as a positive attitude of the respondents. Attitude scores from 16-30 were considered as negative attitude and score above 30 were considered as positive attitude. On examining the attitude in relation to various socio-demographic and economic characteristics, 58% of the respondents had positive attitude towards HIV/AIDS and patients with HIV/AIDS. Nearly 55% women felt that those suffering from HIV/AIDS should have all the rights to reveal their infection status to others, which showed a high positive attitude towards HIV/AIDS patients. Women had positive attitude towards sending their children to schools having HIV-infected children (83%), HIV infected teacher should continue their teaching (80%), and sharing meal with infected person was safe (75%).

More than 50% women felt that HIV infected persons should be allowed to continue their work and to participate in social functions, indicating a positive attitude towards HIV infected persons. The majority of the women (75%) had the opinion that HIV-infected couples should not plan a pregnancy. Many women had the opinion that HIV-infected mother should avoid breast feeding because of risk of transmission of infection from mother to child through milk. Only 7% thought that HIV-infected mother should continue breast-feeding their babies. Mean attitude scores were not significantly different (p>0.05) by age, education level, religion, and living standard index but were for caste (p=0.02) (Table 4). The range of factor loading of each item was 0.3 to 1. Also, the overall lower uniqueness showed reasonable predictability, nearly 65%, of the factor model. The reliability coefficient of 16-items variables in terms of Cronbach’s Alpha, was nearly 0.875, indicating an excellent level of consistency among the response of each item (Table 5).

  Attitude Level Total (N) Mean ± SD p-value*
Factors Positive attitude (>30 score) n(%) Negative attitude (16-30 score)n(%)
All 77 (58) 55(42) 132 31 ± 4.07  
Median=31
IQR=21-35
Age Group
15-24 31(58) 22(42) 53 31.13 ± 3.99 0.49
25-34 35(62) 21(38) 56 31.41 ± 3.93
35-49 11(48) 12 (52) 23 30.65 ± 4.71
Education
Literate 65(58) 46(42) 111 31.14 ± 4.02 0.54
Illiterate 12 (57) 9 (43) 21 31.28 ± 4.42  
Religion
Hindu 70 (60) 46(40) 116 31.14 ± 4.13 0.28
Muslim  7 (44)  9 (56) 16 31.31 ± 3.78  
Caste
General 2 (50) 2 (50) 4 30.0 ± 5.83 0.85
OBC 48 (60) 32(40) 80 31.45 ± 3.82
SC 27 (56) 21 (44) 48 30.79 ± 4.38
Living Index
Low 64 (56) 50 (44) 114 31.10 ± 4.18 0.77
Medium 11 (65) 6 (35) 17 31.71 ± 3.12
High 1 (100) 0 1 31

Table 4: Distribution of attitude level and mean attitude scores by socio-demographic and economic characteristics.

Statement Factor 1 Factor 2 Uniqueness
1. People get HIV/AIDS due to Immoral behavior -0.3827 0.3694 0.5596
2. PLWAH have a right to decide who should know it 0.2102 -0.126 0.6978
3. Sex workers only women to worry about HIV 0.123 -0.072 0.7148
4. Men who go to sex workers or use drugs only men who have to worry about getting HIV/AIDS -0.3368 0.234 0.6172
5. Willing to take care of HIV Infected relatives 0.7888 -0.103 0.2329
6. People with HIV/AIDS should continue living with their family 0.8407 -0.0733 0.135
7. Sharing Meal with HIV infected person 0.8413 0.1057 0.1923
8.Sending children to school with HIV-children -0.7874 0.3839 0.1192
9. HIV infected teacher should continue teaching 0.776 0.2905 0.1406
10. Maintain secrecy of family member HIV-status -0.2974 0.3118 0.7208
11.Moving in a home with HIV-family neighbor 0.8084 -0.1639 0.2584
12. HIV/AIDS people should not be allowed to continue their work 0.6562 0.3943 0.1653
13. HIV/AIDS people should not be allowed to participate social function 0.6657 0.4507 0.1722
14. HIV/AIDS infected couple should not plan for the next pregnancy 0.3983 -0.4679 0.4904
15. HIV infected mother should notbreast feed 0.4125 0.5888 0.3244
16. HIV/AIDS infected women should not be allowed for tattooing -0.3105 0.395 0.5955

Table 5: Factor loadings (pattern matrix) and unique variances of all the components of attitude of women.

Discussion

Our results indicate that 16% wives of migrant workers had ever heard of HIV of whom 72% had correct knowledge. Our study is in conformity with a study of thirteen states of India indicating 17% of women had ever heard of HIV/AIDS [9]. The knowledge about mother-to-child transmission, high risk among sex workers and risk among men with high-risk behaviors was also very high. However, most of the women advocated against breast-feeding because they felt that it could transmit infection from mother to child. Further, a high proportion of women had incorrect knowledge about modes of transmission. Our study reports that nearly 83% believed that mosquitoes could transmit HIV in conformity with results from Iraq [13,14] but distant from Port Moserby with 36% of women attributing to mosquitoes [15]. Another myth about HIV, was observed by our study was that nearly 60% of women informed that eating nutritious food provides protection from HIV infection. There is a need to develop a strategy to target these women to eliminate these kinds of myths in relation to transmission and prevention of HIV/AIDS because these women can be educated easily compared to those who have no knowledge about HIV/AIDS.

The study showed that nearly 58% of women reporting knowledge about HIV/AIDS had a positive attitude towards HIV/AIDS and towards HIV/AIDS patients. These women were found to be sympathetic towards HIV/AIDS patients as majority of them had opinion that HIV/AIDS person should continue living with their family, ready to share meal, allowing their children to visit school with HIV-infected children and infected teacher should continue teaching. The high proportion of positive attitudes among women could be due to some level of education. Many studies have reported good knowledge on HIV/AIDS but along with negative attitude. In comparison with other studies in India, only 27.4% women in rural areas were aware of HIV/AIDS in Uttar Pradesh state [16] while it was 47% in urban areas of Vadodara in Gujarat [17]. Among the regions with high levels of knowledge, our study is in conformity with 96% in Pondicherry [18] and the results of district family health survey in Muzaffarpur district with 89% of women having good level of knowledge [19]. A clinical study in Vellore, Tamil Nadu reported that 29% of the women attending a medical outpatient department for any illness were aware of AIDS [20].

We observed that 85% of these women perceived themselves to be at very low risk of getting HIV infection. Eighty per cent of these women thought that their husbands were also at low risk. Married women in India generally have a low risk perception for HIV despite high-risk behavior of their husbands [3,4,21-23]. Wives of migrant male workers may be no different and therefore may be unlikely to protect themselves from infection from their husbands. Also, young women are biologically more vulnerable to HIV/AIDS infection [24]. Early marriages in rural areas also pose special risks to young women, because in India and especially in Bihar, almost 50% of girls are married by the time they are 18 years of age [7,11,25]. Marriage at young age and early sexual debut are considered risk factors for HIV transmission, especially among the impoverished and illiterate section of the society [4,11,26-28]. In addition, very few women (less than 5%) were using condoms and most common reason quoted was dislike by partners. Low proportion of condom use with migrant workers could be considered as highly risky as because nearly 1% of them in Bihar were found HIV positive in a recent study [29]. The national estimate about the HIV prevalence among migrant workers in 2011 was 2.36% [29]. Most of these migrant workers have no knowledge about their HIV status. In such situation low use of condoms can make the wives more vulnerable to HIV infection [30].

Strengths of the study

This is the first epidemiological study conducted in the most vulnerable group of women comprising of wives of rural single male migrant workers. Our results indicate that there is an imperative need to convince vulnerable women that they are at risk and should take appropriate precautions.

Limitations of the Study

The main limitation of the study is that all information, especially sensitive information, was collected through structured interviews. The overall sensitivity of the response is considered to be around 55-65% on average. Therefore, we could not validate the response related to sexual behavior. Measurement error could be an important source of bias in this study which generally occurs in this kind of survey when respondents are supposed to answer questions related to their personal sexual behavior or sensitive behavior [31].

Recommendations

Despite limitations, our study supports the need for empowerment of women to understand about safe practices. Married women whose husbands are migrant workers should be targeted for special interventions. Given that the general level of awareness of the women was excellent, more widespread education is needed for both migrant workers and their wives in India. Improving the knowledge regarding condom use and appropriate risk perception by women could be an effective tool to reduce the HIV burden among married women. Intervention strategies need to emphasize respect for wives of migrant workers. Specifically, wives made to be aware by program managers and health system that it is their best interest and of family that they should use protection them from infection with HIV and other STIs by their husbands. Thus, effective condom use needs to be emphasized in wives of migrant workers.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by a grant from the UCLA /National Institutes of Health /Fogarty AIDS International Training & Research Program, Grant number: D43 TW000013. We would like to express our gratitude to Wendy Aft and Aritra Das.

References

  1. (2010) HIV declining in India. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, New Delhi, Government of India.
  2. Thomas B, Nyamathi A, Swaminathan S (2009) Impact of HIV/AIDS on mothers in southern India: A qualitative study. AIDS and Behavior 13:989-96.
  3. Mehta SH, Gupta A, Sahay S, Godbole SV, Joshi SN, et al. (2006) High HIV prevalence among a high-risk subgroup of women attending sexually transmitted infection clinics in Pune, India. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 41:75-80.
  4. Ghosh P, Arah OA, Talukdar A, Sur D, Babu GR, et al. (2011) Factors associated with HIV infection among Indian women. International journal of STD & AIDS 22:140-5.
  5. Reza-Paul S, Beattie T, Syed HUR, Venukumar KT, Venugopal MS, et al. (2008) Declines in risk behaviour and sexually transmitted infection prevalence following a community-led HIV preventive intervention among female sex workers in Mysore, India. AIDS 22:S91-S100.
  6. Raj A, Saggurti N, Balaiah D, Silverman JG (2009) Prevalence of child marriage and its effect on fertility and fertility-control outcomes of young women in India: a cross-sectional, observational study. The Lancet 373:1883-9.
  7. Newmann S, Sarin P, Kumarasamy N, Amalraj E, Rogers M, et al. (2000) Marriage, monogamy and HIV: a profile of HIV-infected women in south India. International journal of STD & AIDS 11:250-3.
  8. Krishnan S, Dunbar MS, Minnis AM, Medlin CA, Gerdts CE, et al. (2008) Poverty, gender inequities, and women's risk of human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1136:v101-10.
  9. Balk D, Lahiri S (1997) Awareness and knowledge of AIDS among Indian women: evidence from 13 states. Health Transition Review 421-65.
  10. International Institute for Population S (2007) India National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06: International Institute for Population Sciences.
  11. Mawar N, Mehendale S, Thilakavathi S, Shepherd M, Rodrigues J, et al. (1997) Awareness & knowledge of AIDS & HIV risk among women attending STD clinics in Pune, India. The Indian journal of medical research 106:212-22.
  12. Field A (2005) Factor analysis using SPSS. Retrieve Febuary 25:2008.
  13. Siziya S, Muula AS, Rudatsikira E (2008) HIV and AIDS-related knowledge among women in Iraq. BMC research notes 1:123.
  14. Sandgren E, Sandgren S, Urazalin M, Andersson R (2008) HIV/AIDS awareness and risk behaviour among pregnant women in Semey, Kazakhstan, 2007. BMC Public Health 8:295.
  15. Mazloomy SS, Baghianimoghadam MH (2008) Knowledge and attitude about HIV/AIDS of schoolteachers in Yazd, Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J 14:292-7.
  16. Singh A, Khan S, Chaudhary V, Narula K, Haider ZZ, et al. (2012) Knowledge and awareness About HIV/AIDS among Women of Reproductive Age in a District of Northern India. National Journal of Community Medicine 3-3.
  17. Kotecha PV, Patel S (2008) Measuring knowledge about HIV among youth: Baseline survey for urban slums of Vadodara. Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and AIDS 29:68.
  18. Sarkar S, Danabalan M, Kumar GA (2007) Knowledge and attitude on HIV/AIDS among married women of reproductive age attending a teaching hospital. Indian Journal of Community Medicine 32:82.
  19. Sciences IIoP (2007) District Fact Sheet, Muzaffarpur District, Bihar. 2007 2007-08.
  20. Jacob KS, Jayakumari H, John JK, John TJ (1989) Awareness of AIDS in India: effect of public education through the mass media. BMJ 299:721.
  21. Allen S, Meinzen-Derr J, Kautzman M, Zulu I, Trask S, et al. (2003) Sexual behavior of HIV discordant couples after HIV counseling and testing. Aids 17:733-40.
  22. Panchanadeswaran S, Johnson SC, Mayer KH, Srikrishnan AK, Sivaran S, et al. (2006) Gender differences in the prevalence of sexually transmitted infections and genital symptoms in an urban setting in southern India. Sexually transmitted infections 82:491-5.
  23. Gangakhedkar RR, Bentley ME, Divekar AD, Gadkari D, Mehendale SM, et al. (1997) Spread of HIV infection in married monogamous women in India. Jama278:2090-2.
  24. Blum RW, Nelson-Mmari K (2004) The health of young people in a global context. Journal of Adolescent Health 35:402-18.
  25. (2012) National AIDS Control Organization DoAC. Youth.
  26. Sarkar K, Bal B, Mukherjee R, Saha MK, Chakraborty S, et al. (2006) Young age is a risk factor for HIV among female sex workers—an experience from India. Journal of Infection 53:255-9
  27. Greenberg J, Magder L, Aral S (1992) Age at First Coitus A Marker for Risky Sexual Behavior in Women. Sexually transmitted diseases 19:331-4.
  28. Kaestle CE, Halpern CT, Miller WC, Ford CA (2005) Young age at first sexual intercourse and sexually transmitted infections in adolescents and young adults. American Journal of Epidemiology 161:774-80.
  29. Dave SS, Copas A, Richens J, White RG, Kosambiya JK, et al. (2012) HIV and STI prevalence and determinants among male migrant workers in India. PloS one. 7:e43576.
  30. Das A, Babu GR, Ghosh P, Mahapatra T, Malmgren R, et al. (2013) Epidemiologic correlates of willingness to be tested for HIV and prior testing among married men in India. International journal of STD & AIDS 24:957-68.
  31. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (2008) Modern epidemiology. (3edn)Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Post your comment

Share This Article

Relevant Topics

Recommended Conferences

Article Usage

  • Total views: 12357
  • [From(publication date):
    August-2015 - Oct 17, 2017]
  • Breakdown by view type
  • HTML page views : 8504
  • PDF downloads :3853
 

Post your comment

captcha   Reload  Can't read the image? click here to refresh

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords