Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Article

The Japanese Legal System and the Pro Homine Principle in Human Rights Treaties

Valerio de Oliveira Mazzuoli* and Dilton Ribeiro

Faculty of Law, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Brazil

*Corresponding Author:
Valerio de Oliveira Mazzuoli
Faculty of Law, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Brazil
Tel No: 55659620-8234
E-mail: mazzuoli@ufmt.br

Received Date: May 19, 2014; Accepted Date: May 31, 2014; Published Date: June 02, 2014

Citation: de Oliveira Mazzuoli V, Ribeiro D (2014) The Japanese Legal System and the Pro Homine Principle in Human Rights Treaties. J Civil Legal Sci 3:123. doi:10.4172/2169-0170.1000123

Copyright: © 2014 de Oliveira Mazzuoli V, et al. This is an open-access articledistributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

The objective and purpose of international human rights is the protection of the human person. Individuals are the primary concern and addressees of human rights norms and principles. Accordingly, all human rights instruments seek the best possible protection for the human person. This theory, which underpins the entire human rights system, is called the pro homine principle. In our view, this pro homine framework of international law was fully accepted by the Japanese Constitution through its Article 11. It forbids restrictive interpretation of rights – limitation of rights must be restrictively interpreted – and it can be a guideline to analyze omissions in human rights norms. Accordingly, Article 11 fits all the criteria of the pro homine principle by crystalizing a true public order which prioritizes the human person setting the parameters to interpret and apply human rights norms. Consequently, this provision allows a “dialogue of sources” seeking the best norm which could better protect individuals in a specific situation regardless of its international or domestic status or hierarchy.

Keywords

Top