Spanish 
Chinese 
Russian 
German 
French 
Japanese 
Portuguese 
Hindi Research Article
The Resilient Internet
McKay Cunningham*
Concordia University School of Law, Chicago, USA
- Corresponding Author:
- McKay Cunningham
Concordia University School of Law, Chicago, USA
Tel: 208-639-5412 - Fax: 208-639-5498
E-mail: mccunningham@cu-portland.edu
Received April 28, 2016; Accepted May 16, 2016; Published May 23, 2016
Citation: Cunningham M (2016) The Resilient Internet. J Civil Legal Sci 5:190. doi:10.4172/2169-0170.1000190
Copyright: © 2016 Cunningham M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Abstract
Many commentators laud European privacy law as a vital protection in the Internet age. They hail the “right to be forgotten” as necessary to individual privacy. Conversely, commentators on the other side champion free expression and highlight the censorship threat implicit within the right to be forgotten. But few have discussed the practicalities. The right to be forgotten, as applied, is not working. As soon as European law strips content from Google searches, for example, that content is added back into the cyber commons through alternative avenues. The controversy, in other words, may be theoretical only, since implementation of the “right to be forgotten” falters against Internet resilience. This paper suggests that European policymakers failed to confirm their privacy law to the Internet’s architecture. They failed to account for the borderless flow of information, leaving the ongoing controversy over free expression and censorship moot.
