What Proportion Of Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Requires Emergency Endoscopy? | 3362
Journal of Gastrointestinal & Digestive System
Like us on:
Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
Most patients who present with gastrointestinal bleeding have stopped bleeding when they arrive in hospital. Although it is a
standard practice for those who exhibit homodynamic instability or features of continued bleeding to undergo emergency
endoscopy with view to endoscopic arrest of bleeding, the proportion of patients who require this has not been widely addressed.
A study was undertaken to determine
The proportion of patients undergoing emergency endoscopy (after initial resuscitation) and
The proportion of patients undergoing semi urgent endoscopy (within 24 hours of presentation) who were found to have bleeding
lesions which required endoscopic intervention to arrest haemorrhage
Tertiary Centre Surgical Gastrointestinal Unit
All patients undergoing emergency and semi urgent (within 24 hrs) diagnostic and/or therapeutic endoscopy.
Patients undergoing subsequent endoscopic procedures for repeat diagnostic or therapeutic procedures
Patients with tachycardia, hypotension and/or evidence of continued bleeding e.g. haemetemesis while in
hospital were resuscitated and then underwent emergency endoscopy.
Semiurgent Endoscopy: Patients who did not have tachycardia or hypotension underwent endoscopy in the next available endoscopy
session within 24 hours.
7 out of 46 (15%) patients were found to have active bleeding on upper endoscopy. All the 7 (24%) patients belonged to the
emergency group who were scoped immediately after resuscitation, while in the semi-urgent group none was found to have active
bleeding when they were scoped within 24 hours after presentation to A & E.2 (7%) patients in emergency and 5 (29%) patients in
the semi-urgent group had stigmata of recent haemorrhage on endoscopy. The bleeding could have stopped in the interval between
resuscitation and emergency endoscopy.
All patients with symptoms of upper GI bleeding do not require endoscopy immediately on arrival to the hospital as
only 15% were found to be having active bleeding. Although the bleeding may have ceased in the interval between resuscitation and
emergency endoscopy, this relatively large proportion may reflect the comfortable safety margin of the selection criteria for emergency
endoscopy, it may have implications on on-call emergency staffing.
Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals