Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Article

Framing Human Rights and the Production of Translation Legal Consciousness

Keren Wang*

Department of Communication Arts & Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Keren Wang
Department of Communication Arts& Sciences
Pennsylvania State University, 234 Lewis Katz Building
University Park, PA 16802-5201, USA
Tel: +1 814-865-3461
E-mail: kuw148@psu.edu

Received Date: January 08, 2016; Accepted Date: February 09, 2016; Published Date: February 16, 2016

Citation: Wang K (2016) Framing Human Rights and the Production of Translation Legal Consciousness. J Civil Legal Sci 5:177. doi:10.4172/2169-0170.1000177

Copyright: © 2016 Wang K. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

This paper presents a case study on a complaint document filed by the British NGO “Survival International” against the multinational mining conglomerate Vedanta Resources for alleged human rights violations. By examining the internal and external dynamics of the text of the complaint document, this paper seeks to delineate the strategic framing of rights violations by Survival International within the context of international legal discourse. The document operates beyond the contours of international legal formalism. The complaint document functions as a polycentric legal document, as it seeks to bridge the gap between “hard” and “soft” international legal structures through the invocation of multiple discrete norm systems in a unified fashion. Most importantly, by bringing together civil-political and socioeconomic rights into a singular, indivisible human rights narrative frame, the documents serves as an example of the ways which non-state actors utilize the discursive dynamics of the polycentric global norm structures for disciplining corporate social responsibility.

Keywords

Top