alexa

GET THE APP

Catastrophic Events in the Perioperative Setting: A Survey of U.S. Anesthesiologists | OMICS International | Abstract
ISSN: 1522-4821

International Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience
Open Access

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Article

Catastrophic Events in the Perioperative Setting: A Survey of U.S. Anesthesiologists

Anahat K. Dhillon1*, Dana L. Russell1, Marjorie P. Stiegler2

1Department of Anesthesiology, David Geffen School of Medicine/University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

2Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

*Corresponding Author:
Anahat K. Dhillon
E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Catastrophic events in the perioperative period can adversely impact the wellbeing of the healthcare workers involved. These second victims may experience symptoms including depression, isolation and loss of confidence related to the event. A limited amount of published research suggests those who receive formal support (e.g. departmental debriefing) may have an improved recovery experience. This cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the proportion of U.S. anesthesiologists who have experienced catastrophic perioperative events and bring into focus the association between event details, respondent characteristics and utilization of formal support with recovery time. Additionally, we aimed to ascertain the current state of post-event formal support and opinions for ideal event handling across the anesthesiology practice. A seventeen-question survey was distributed to 5,000 attending anesthesiologist members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). 289 responses were received. 85% report having experienced a catastrophic event; greater than 80% of those involved a death. 42% took a few days or less to recover yet 24% took a year or more. 31% had department debriefing and 25% had multidisciplinary debriefing. No association between gender, practice setting, years of experience and recovery time was detected. Comments revealed highly individualized recovery experiences and heterogeneity in processes for post-event debrief. Regarding current, institutional practice: 56% report there is no departmental debriefing team and 16% do not know if such a team exists. 49% feel debriefing should be mandatory. Comments reflect a variety of opinions regarding ideal support. Resources that address the complexities of the recovery experience should be thoughtfully developed and made available to those who may benefit from them.

Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 1498

International Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience received 1498 citations as per Google Scholar report

International Journal of Emergency Mental Health and Human Resilience peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Open J Gate
  • Academic Keys
  • ResearchBible
  • CiteFactor
  • Cosmos IF
  • CINAHL Complete
  • Scimago
  • British Library
  • SCOPUS
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • World Catalogue of Scientific Journals
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Proquest Summons
  • Publons
  • University Of Baltimore
  • University Grants Commission
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • University of Lincoln
Share This Page
Top