Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Research Article

Effect of Knowing Patients' Wishes and Health Profession on Euthanasia

Mireille Lavoie1,2*, Gaston Godin1, Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im1, Danielle Blondeau1, Isabelle Martineau3 and Louis Roy4

1Faculty of Nursing, Laval University, Québec, Canada

2Équipe de Recherche Michel-Sarrazin en Oncologie psychosociale et Soins palliatifs (ERMOS), Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Canada

3Maison Michel-Sarrazin, Québec, Canada

4Hôpital de l’Enfant-Jésus du CHU de Québec, Québec, Canada

*Corresponding Author:
Mireille Lavoie
Faculty of Nursing, Laval University, Québec, Canada, G1V 0A6
Tel: 418-656-2131(8590)
Fax: 418-656-3920
E-mail: mireille.lavoie@fsi.ulaval.ca

Received date January 14, 2014; Accepted date February 22, 2014; Published date February 28, 2014

Citation: Lavoie M, Godin G, Vézina-Im LA, Blondeau D, Martineau I, et al. (2014) Effect of Knowing Patients’ Wishes and Health Profession on Euthanasia. J Palliat Care Med 4: 169. doi:10.4172/2165-7386.1000169

Copyright: © 2014 Lavoie M, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Abstract

Background: Respecting patients’ autonomy is often put forward as one of the main reasons why certain health professionals are favourable to euthanasia. Few studies have compared whether nurses and physicians hold different beliefs regarding euthanasia. The objective of the study was to experimentally test whether knowing patients’ wishes and profession can affect health professionals’ intentions and beliefs regarding performing euthanasia. Methods: This a 2×2 random factorial design study (experimental conditions: patient’s wishes known or not; professions: nurses or physicians). A vignette describing the case of a person near death was used to manipulate knowledge of patient’s wishes. Random samples of nurses and physicians from the province of Québec, Canada, were obtained using random digit tables. Samples were weighted according to the domains of practice and medical specialties included in the study. Data were collected by means of an anonymous questionnaire based on an extended version of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Results: Overall, the response rate was 41.3%. There was a significant known wishes×profession interaction for intention, F (3, 266)=7.38, p=0.0070 and only a known wishes effect for the other beliefs, F (6, 256)=2.86, p=0.0102. Scores for intention and the other beliefs were lower among physicians who were exposed to the vignette where patient’s wishes were unknown. Conclusion: Knowing patients’ wishes regarding euthanasia appears to influence physicians, but not nurses. This is the first study to test whether knowledge of patient’s wishes and profession have an impact on health professionals’ intention and beliefs regarding euthanasia.

Keywords

Recommended Conferences

World Nursing Congress

Toronto, Canada
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 2035

Journal of Palliative Care & Medicine received 2035 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Palliative Care & Medicine peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Virtual Library of Biology (vifabio)
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
  • ICMJE
Share This Page
Top