Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Principles of causality assessment and sender’s comment: everyday challenges and possible solutions

*Corresponding Author:

Copyright: © 2020  . This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

 
To read the full article Peer-reviewed Article PDF image

Abstract

Assessing the causal relationship between a drug (or IMP) and the adverse event occurred plays a crucial role in the safety reporting flow, and it can be seen sometimes as challenging as it depends on multiple key factors (such as: temporal relationship, pharmaceutical properties of the drug/IMP, knowledge of the event, just to mention some). Counfounding risk factors can be present as well as lack of important information that make more difficult such assessment. What to do in these cases?

How our choice impact the results? And what are the challenges in making a decision which should always be be risk-based, reliable and considering what it is already known about the company’s products, but also, what is possibly unknown yet.

Keywords

Top