An Overview of Mycotoxin Contamination of Foods and Feeds
Received: 21-Sep-2017 / Accepted Date: 09-Oct-2017 / Published Date: 15-Oct-2017
Mycotoxins contamination of foods and feeds remain a great challenge to food safety and of public health and economic significance. Mycotoxins occur in various foodstuffs, from raw agricultural commodities to processed foods with varying impacts on food processing. The major group of mycotoxins that contaminate foods and feeds include aflatoxins, fumonisins and patulin. Several studies conducted to reveal the metabolism of mycotoxins in the body are reviewed. Health implications of mycotoxins upon consumption of adequate doses are diverse. They include subacute mycotoxicosis, immune suppression, carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, morbidity and mortality in animals and humans as well as interaction with nutrient assimilation. Mycotoxicity of foods have tremendous effect on international trade, resulting in huge losses. There are regulations, though not in all countries, aimed at preventing and controlling Mycotoxins which operate only on industrially processed foods and those meant for exports but not locally processed ones. A number of strategies for preventing mycotoxins have been proposed but the awareness for implementation is very low. The use of media to create awareness is a viable option.
Keywords: Food; Feeds; Mycotoxins; Contamination; Mycotoxicity; Mycotoxin metabolism; Prevention
Mycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by moulds which contaminate foods and have toxic effects on the health of humans and animals. Mycotoxins are produced primarily by the fungi which belong to Aspergillus, Penicillium and Fusarium genera. Fungi proliferate to produce secondary metabolites under favorable environmental conditions, when temperature and moisture are suitable. Fungi are a normal part of the micro flora of standing crops and stored feeds, but the production of Mycotoxin depend upon the fungi present, agronomic practices, the composition of the commodity and the conditions of harvesting, handling and storage . The amount of toxin produced will depend on physical factors (moisture, relative humidity, temperature and mechanical damage), chemical factors (carbon dioxide, oxygen, composition of substrate, pesticide and fungicides), and biological factors (plant variety, stress, insects, spore load).
Several fungal metabolites which are toxic in experimental systems abound, however, there are only five that are of major agricultural importance: aflatoxin, produced by Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus ; deoxynivalenol, produced by Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum ; fumonisin , produced by Fusarium verticillioides (exmoniliforme); ochratoxin, produced by Aspergillus ochraceus and Penicillium verrucosum ; and zearalenone, produced by various Fusarium species . These toxins produced by fungal species remain stable throughout the processing periods and cooking of feeds and foods (aflatoxin , ochratoxin , fumonisin , deoxynivalenol . Fungal infection and subsequent production of Mycotoxin can occur at the field during crop growth or harvesting, and may continue during storage. The occurrence of this Mycotoxin at a considerably high level of concentration in foods can cause toxic effects ranging from acute to chronic (mutagenic, teratogenic, carcinogenic) manifestations in humans and animals . Animals that have been fed with Mycotoxincontaminated feeds release products which can be dietary sources of some Mycotoxin .
Human diseases arising from Mycotoxin cut across a large part of the globe without boundaries. There are thousands of fungal secondary metabolites currently known, but only a few groups are reported to be important from the safety and economic points of view; namely aflatoxins (AFs), mainly produced by Aspergillus species; ochratoxin A (OTA), produced by Aspergillus and Penicillium species, and zearalenone (ZEA), fumonisins (FUM) and trichothecenes (TCTs) (especially deoxynivalenol (DON)), primarily produced by many Fusarium species [9-11].
The economic impact of Mycotoxin is diverse, from loss of human and animal life to reduced livestock production, disposal of contaminated foods and feeds and investment in research . As a result of deleterious effects of Mycotoxin on humans and farm animals, a good number of countries in the world have implemented several regulations which prescribe the limits of Mycotoxin in several food commodities intended for consumption. In 1993, the WHOInternational Agency for Research on Cancer evaluated the carcinogenic potential of AFT, OTA, TCT, ZEA, and FUMs [13,14].
So many efforts have been made towards control and reduction of mycotoxin contamination of foods but the ubiquitous nature of toxigenic fungi enables their wide occurrence. It is also noted that in most rural areas of the world, no effort is made towards the control of toxigenic fungi in food contamination. The aim of this work is have a general overview of Mycotoxins contamination of foods.
Foods implicated in mycotoxins contamination
Mycotoxins are reported to have occurred in many agricultural products ranging from raw to process, hence, becoming a worldwide issue . They have the capacity to remain stable during processing of foods , indicating difficulty of getting rid of them. Reports that mycotoxin is naturally fairly distributed as contaminants of many cereals, (Table 1) as well as other food commodities  and feeds [18,19] along the food chain. While AFB1 and OTA are among the most frequently observed mycotoxin in foods , the other types are occasional contaminants depending on the factor prevailing on their occurrences where they are located. Several authors indicated the prevalence of aflatoxigenic and ochratoxigenic mould growth and toxin production [21,22].
|Cereals||Corn (grains, gluten); Rice; Wheat; Barley; Oats; Rye; Sorghum; Millet|
|Cereal products for human consumption||Cracked grains; Cereal cleanings; Wheat bran|
|cereal feed products||Corn bran; Rice bran|
Major groups of mycotoxin in foods
Aflatoxins: These are the most prominent mycotoxins produced by species of Aspergillus [23-25] which are subdivided into AFB1, B2, G1 and G2 . Aflatoxins are major contaminants of foods especially in the tropical region where the climatic factors favor their production. They are common among food commodities, such as: maize, spices, cereals, peanuts, pistachios, cotton and groundnuts. Of all these crops, they appear to be more common in cereal products for reason yet to be fully investigated. Cereal products are very popular foods in Nigeria which are processed into different types of drinks, fruits and snacks. The susceptibility of these foods, the aflatoxin contamination [27,28] is therefore of public health significance. Speijars and speijars,  reported a co-existence of AFB1 and OTA in food commodities indicating that foods may be contaminated by multiple mycotoxins at a time. Several factors may be responsible for the mixed growth of mycotoxin producing fungi occurring simultaneously in foods. There are reports that AFB1 is frequently found contaminating food while AFM1 is hardly present in foods except from animal feeds [29,30]. AFB1 which also contaminates feed stuffs are being transformed by lactating cows trough the hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 to AFM1 from where they find their way into the milk , this makes consumer of raw milk highly susceptible. There is a correlation between the level of AFB1 in feeds and AFM1 in milk . AFM1 can be dictated in milk within 24 hours after consumption AFB1 infested feed . AFM1 binds to casein where it is highly stable in the curd. The level of AFM1 in cheese can be affected by the technology applied in cheese production [34,35]. Since AFM1 is contaminants of milk, invariably, it can contaminate many dairy products [36-38]. The processing methods and ripening periods of cheese have not been found to reduce mycotoxins [39,40]. This is why the risk remains, not only in commercially available milk but also other derived dairy products. Though, AFM1 concentration in cheese may vary based on cheese, water content and production technologies [32,37]. AFM1 contamination in animal feeds from different countries of the world has been reported [41-44]. AFM1 contamination of feed stuffs may be more divergent than is being reported. Ochratoxin A which was discovered in South – Africa in 1965  has derivatives A, B and C [46-48] and are well documented as global contaminant of variety commodities and stable foods. Humans are directly and indirectly exposed to OTA through the food chain where contamination of the ingredient and food stuffs or through contamination of the feeds for animals meant for human consumption [49,50]. Toxins like citrines produce by Penicillium citrinum is now produced by several species of Penicillium and Aspergillus some of which are found in feeds . From the foregoing there seems to be the existence of new forms of mycotoxins yet to be identified in feeds and foods.
Patulin: Patulin (PAT) was discovered in 1943 in relation to P. griseofulvum and P. expansum . The molecule was first studied as a potential antibiotic, but the subsequent research demonstrated its toxicological properties [54,55]. Patulin is a toxin produced by, Aspergillus , Penicillium , and Paecilomyces fungal species. P. expansum is a common contaminant of spoilt fruits and vegetables, as well as rotting apples and Figs [56,57]. These mycotoxins can be found in different food products and raw materials, but apples and apple byproducts are of greatest concern regarding PAT accumulation: the frequency of contamination in other food resources and products is much lower than in apple processing .
Fumonisins: A product of Fusarium species, notably F. verticillioides , F. proliferatum, F. anthophilum, F. nygamai as well as Alternaria alternata [59-61]. Fumonisins found in food are produced mainly in the field before harvesting. Fumonising remain stable during this period due to temperature and moisture conditions which are important factors for Fusarium infection and toxin production . Fumonisins, like other mycotoxins, infect corn-based foods and feeds and their occurrence has also been reported in other products, such as: rice and sorghum .
Fumonisins B1 and B2 have been reported in “black oat” feeds from Brazil and forage grass in New Zealand. FB1 and FB2 have been found in rural areas of South Africa, in homegrown corn produced and consumed by the people living in those areas. Commercial corn based human foodstuff from retail outlets in several countries contain fumonisins .
Biosynthesis of mycotoxins
Table 2 shows mycotoxigenic fungi and their related mycotoxins among which the biosynthesis of mycotoxins by the major toxigenic species (Table 3) are selectively discussed.
|Aflatoxins||Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus, A. nomius, A. bombycis, A. ochraceoroseus, A. pseudotamari||Nuts, spices, Cereals, maize, soybean, rice|
|Ochratoxin A||Penicillium verrucosum, P. auriantiogriseum,
P. nordicum, P. palitans, P. commune, P. variabile,
Aspergillus ochraceus, A. melleus, A. niger,
A. carbonarius, A. sclerotiorum, A. sulphureus
|Cereals, fruits, spices, coffee, Food of animal origin|
|Citrinin||Penicillium citrinum, P. verrucosum, P. viridicatum, Monascus purpureus||Oats, rice, corn, beans, fruits, fruit and vegetable juices, herbs and spices|
|Zearalenone||Fusarium graminearum, F. sporotrichoides, F. culmorum, F. cerealis, F. equiseti, F. incarnatum||Maize, soybean, cereals|
|Deoksynivalenol||Fusarium graminearum, F. culmorum, F. crokwellense||Maize, soybean, cereals|
|Alternaria alternata, A. brassicae, A. capsici-anui, A. citri, A. cucumerina, A. dauci, A. kikuchiana, A. solani, A. tenuissima, A. tomato, A. longipes, A. infectoria, A. oregonensis||Vegetables, fruit, cereals, soybean|
|Tenuazonic acid||Alternaria alternata, A. capsici-anui, A. citri, A. japonica, A. kikuchiana, A. mali, A. solani, A. oryzae, A. porri, A. radicina, A. tenuissima, A. tomato, A. longipes||Vegetables, fruit, cereals, soybean|
|Fumonisins||Fusarium proliferatum, F. verticillioides||Maize, soybean, cereals|
|Percentage of positives||26%||37%||56%||54%||25%|
|Average positives (µg/kg)||57||286||1,009||1,647||14|
|Median positives (µg/kg)||11||85||453||750||2.6|
|1st quartile positives (μg/kg)||3||43||234||332||1.1|
|3rd quartile positives (μg/kg)||40||225||972||1,780||6.2|
|Sample origin||Myanmar||Australia||Central Europe||China||China|
|Sample type (analysis year)||other feed (2012)||silage (2007)||wheat (2007)||finished feed (2011)||finished feed (2011)|
Table 3: Summary of the global survey of mycotoxins .
Trichothecenes pathway begins with an enzyme trichodiene synthase which cyclize farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) to trichodiene. The enzyme possesses sub-units molecular mass of 45 kDa and usually isolated from Fusarium sporotrichioides . The subsequent pathway involves esterification and oxygenation of trichodiene diacetoxyscirpenol, T-2 toxin and 3-cetyldeoxynivalenol . The genes involved are: tri 5; Tri 4 and Tri 3 .
Fumonisins are synthesized by the condensation of the amino acid alanine to an acetate-derived precursor. Structurally, they possess C–20 diester of propane–1, 2, 3 tricarboxylic acid and peritahydroxylcosane with primary amino group. The enzyme adenosyl methionine transferase is attached to the C-12 and C-16 of the branded chain methyl group , though, the isolation of this enzyme has not been documented .
The biosynthetic pathway of Aflatoxin has been well documented [78-80]. A polyketide synthase converted to norsolorinic acid by a fatty acid synthase. Conversion of enzymes occurs up to 12-17 ways with series of intermediates in polyketide. Then, AFB1 and AFG1 are produced after the formation of versicolorin B. Several enzymes that occur in aflatoxin and sterigmatocystin biosynthetic pathway are: O– methyl tranferase; fatty acid synthase; polyketide synthase; desaturase; versicolorin B synthase; verisconal hemiacetal acetate reductase; and norsolorinic acid reductase. The genes involved in aflatoxin are: fas1A, fas 2A; pksA; nor1, norA, avA; avfI, vbs, ver B; ver1A; afls; omtA and ordI. For sterigmatocystin biosynthesis are: stc J and stc K; stc A; stcE; stc F; stcI; stcN; stcL; stcS; stcU and stcP [81,82]. Different enzymes involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis have been documented [83,84]. The global summary of mycotoxin production by fungi is presented on Table 4.
|Aspergillus flavus; Aspergillus parasiticus||Aflatoxins|
|Aspergillus flavus||Cyclopiazonic acid|
|A. ochraceus; Penicillium viridicatum; P. cyclopium||Ochatoxin A|
|Fusarium culmorum; F. graminearum; F. sporotrichioides||Deoxynivalenol|
|F. sporotrichioides; F. poae||T-2 toxin|
|F. sporotrichioides; F. graminearum; F. poae||Diacetoxyscirpenol|
|F. culmorum; F. graminearum; F. sporotrichioides||Zearalenone|
|Acremonium coenophialum||Ergopeptine alkaloids|
Table 4: The major toxigenic species of fungi and their principal mycotoxins .
The metabolism of mycotoxins
Coker  reported that metabolism of aflatoxin B1 can be used to give an illustration with regards to the metabolic process in determining mycotoxin toxicity, and also as a means of determining exposure to mycotoxins, by measuring; mycotoxin-macromolecular conjugates, the parent mycotoxin and a biochemical change initiated by the mycotoxin, respectively.
Metabolism of aflatoxin: Much of the studies carried out to determine the metabolic fate of aflatoxins both in vivo and in vitro with the use of animal tissues have been conducted mainly on aflatoxin B1. Studies involving the measurement of aflatoxin B1, and its metabolites, in blood, urine, milk and isolated tissues are limited. Metabolism has been studied in many species and under many different conditions [86,87]. Under natural conditions, exposure to the aflatoxins may occur by ingestion of food contaminated and by the inhalation of contaminated dust particle contaminated with the fungal toxin. In addition to these natural routes, intraperitoneal (ip), intravenous (iv) and dermatitis administration have been used under experimental conditions. The completeness of absorption of aflatoxin B1 after oral exposure have been shown using radiolabelled aflatoxin B1 in rats and monkeys which demonstrated little difference in the distribution and excretion of the toxin after either oral or intraperitoneal administration [86-88]. Aflatoxin B1 can also be absorbed rapidly, by passive diffusion, from the small intestines (especially the duodenum) into the mesenteric venous blood. The composition of the intestinal epithelium is an important criterion since aflatoxin B1 is lipophilic in nature. Although the liver is regarded as the main site of aflatoxin transformation, gastrointestinal metabolism will reduce the exposure of the liver to aflatoxin B1 and, in terms of hepatic toxicity, is an important means of detoxification [89,90]. After absorption, aflatoxin B1 is transformed resulting in the activation and detoxification of the toxin and the process is known to occur in two phases . The toxin is first transformed to a selection of metabolites and, then the metabolites are converted to either water soluble conjugates or macromolecular adducts . Several factors including the genetic make-up of the species, nutritional and health status, and exposure to metabolic modifiers in foodstuffs affect the modulation of the transformation process .
The major metabolites of aflatoxin B1 includes aflatoxin B1-8,9- epoxide, -8,9-dihydro-8,9-diol; the aflatoxins-B2a, -P1, M1-Q1; aflatoxicol, aflatoxicol H1 and aflatoxicol M1 [94,95]. However, not all metabolites have been identified in all species.
Aflatoxin B1 gets activated in the liver where the toxin is seen to interact with both DNA and protein to elicit the carcinogenic and acutely toxic effects of aflatoxin, respectively. Initially, aflatoxin B1 is converted, by cytochrome P450, to the highly reactive aflatoxin B1-8,9- epoxide which in turn may be converted to aflatoxin B1 -dihydrodiol [85,96,97]. Aflatoxin B1 is converted to at least seven metabolites, including a proposed unstable metabolite, the aflatoxin B1 -8, 9- epoxide, which is the so called ultimate carcinogenic form [89,98]. The carcinogenicity of aflatoxin B1 arises from interaction with guanine moiety of DNA, to produce the aflatoxin-N7-guanine adduct , while the acute toxicity of aflatoxin B1 arises from interaction between the dihydrodiol and protein amino groups to produce Schiff base adduct . The 8,9-dihydro-8-9-diol; the aflatoxins –B2a,- P1, M1, - Q1; aflatoxicol, aflatoxicol H1 and aflatoxicol M1 are the major metabolites of aflatoxin B1 [94,100]. However, not all metabolites have been identified in all species. Aflatoxicol is a major aflatoxin B1 in rat plasma . It is reported as having equivalent carcinogenic potency as aflatoxin B1 [102,103], and about 70% the mutagenicity [104,105]. This aflatoxicol may act as a reservoir for aflatoxin B1, in vivo , thereby prolonging the lifetime of the toxin in the body since aflatoxicol can be readily converted back to aflatoxin B1.
Health implications of mycotoxins
Subacute chronic toxicity and growth faltering: Subacute mycotoxicoses which are toxic effects by mycotoxins occur with a lot of symptoms in humans and they include moderate to severe liver damage, reproductive problems, appetite loss, digestive tract discomfort, diarrhoea, growth faltering, immune suppression, increased morbidity, and premature mortality . Aflatoxin is also implicated in the degenerative diseases childhood hepatic cirrhosis and Reye’s syndrome . Aflatoxins have been shown to pass from mother to fetus through the placenta, thus having the potential to affect prenatal infant development .
Immune suppression: Increased morbidity and mortality in animals and humans: In 1993, the International Agency for Research on Cancer reported that Aflatoxin B1 is hepatotoxic in humans and animals and is nephrotoxic and immunosuppressive in animals. Experimentally exposing animals to a chemical family of Fusarium toxins called trichothecenes causes severe damage to actively dividing cells in bone marrow, lymph nodes, spleen, thymus, and intestinal mucosa . These trichothecenes can be immune suppressive at lower doses . Miller and Trenholm  concluded that mycotoxins are likely to be immunotoxic to humans as well following their studies on animals. Pestka and Bondy  dismissed the problem for the developed world with the reason that the high doses of mycotoxins might be most likely encountered in animal feed that is not inspected for interregional or international commerce. However, human food is regulated at the low parts per billion ranges in Canada, the United States, and most developed countries because of potent hepato carcinogenicity of aflatoxins. Thus, vigilant monitoring should minimize the potential for aflatoxin-induced immune suppression in humans.” Monitoring is effectively done in the developed world. In the developing world, except in cases of exports of vulnerable commodities such as groundnuts or coffee to the developed nations, monitoring of internal food supplies is rarely implemented .
Interaction with nutrient assimilation: Hendrickse  reported that protein–energy malnutrition, kwashiorkor, and aflatoxin exposure appear to be seasonally linked in tropical regions where aflatoxins are present. However, research has shown that there is no specific causeand- effect relationship between aflatoxin and kwashiorkor, but children with kwashiorkor who had tested positive for aflatoxin in blood and urine had statistically significantly longer hospital stays and suffered from more infections [111,112]. Thus, aflatoxin acted in conjunction with kwashiorkor, possibly by immune suppression, to worsen the prognosis . Vitamins are thought to ameliorate genotoxicity, and aflatoxin B1 interacts with assimilation of vitamins A and E.
Carcinogenicity and genotoxicity: To underscore the correlation between cancer and aflatoxin, the incidence of primary liver cancer and the intake of aflatoxins in the same population groups has been demonstrated in Swaziland  and corroborated by data from Mozambique . In China, maize was the major source of aflatoxin exposure hence a correlation was established in mortality rate from liver cancer in high risk area with food contamination recording 372/100,000 as against low risk area with 33/100,000 .
Human exposure to ochratoxin primarily occurs from whole grain breads, although coffee and wine are also implicated when fungi infect the berries and grapes. Marasas  suggested that levels of 100–200 ppb would be safe for humans consuming large amounts of contaminated maize.
Acute aflatoxicosis (severe aflatoxin poisoning) occurs in poultry, swine, and cattle consuming feeds contaminated with aflatoxins. The same can appear in humans, and cases of lethal toxic hepatitis attributed to consumption of aflatoxin-contaminated maize have occurred [107,117,118]. Large-scale acute human toxicoses due to consuming wheat and rice contaminated with deoxynivalenol have occurred in modern times in India  China, and Korea, among other countries .
Effect of food mycotoxicity on international Trade
All EU member states have regulations for 12 mycotoxins. In Africa, 15 countries have regulations. That means most countries in Africa have no regulations even when such regulations are needed. Having no regulation is not that mycotoxin problems do not exist. On the other hand, regulations for small-scale and subsistence systems is a complete failure. Considering export compliance with food safety and quality standards, a total of USD1.2 billion was observed to be involved. The World Bank estimate of losses in trade amount to USD450 million. In an effort to meet standard, some countries put in place relevant institutions for regulations and export the best quality produce while the poor quality ones are domestically consumed. This in itself compromises food safety regulations. Imported products with high risk of mycotoxin contamination include maize, cereals, coffee, spices, peanuts, pistachio nuts and other nuts spread through many continents. However, prevalence rate differ from one part of the world to the other.
Regulation and prevention of mycotoxins: The world’s food crops have been significantly contaminated with mycotoxins. Significant losses due to mycotoxins and their impact on human and animal health have been linked with national economic implications and all these factors have combined to make mycotoxins important worldwide . Many international agencies are trying to achieve universal standardization of regulatory limits for mycotoxins. Currently, over 100 countries are said to have regulations regarding mycotoxins in the food industry  which is a good development for all the nations of the world to do the same. From the studies of food-based mycotoxins in the last century, limits are being set. Hence, statutory levels of a range of mycotoxins permitted in food and animal feed are set by a range of European directives and EC regulations [25,48,122] in consultations with the Scientific Committee for Food, based on the analysis of scientific data collected by EFSA and the Codex Alimentarius (Table 5). This has resulted in the establishment of aflatoxins limits in many other countries to protect consumers from harmful mycotoxins that can contaminate foods. The Commission Regulations is of the opinion that the maximum levels should be set at a strict level which is reasonably achievable by following good agricultural and manufacturing practices and taking into account the risk related to the consumption of food. Such good agricultural and manufacturing practices require strict monitoring for improvement in compliance. Health protection of infants, young children and immunecompromised who belong to the vulnerable group of consumers require establishing the lowest levels of mycotoxins, which can be achieved through selection of raw material ingredients used for foods production. With the development of international trade, there is corresponding progress in research focused on mycotoxin food contamination and their toxicological properties. This has resulted in modified changes in the mycotoxin-related legislation across the European Union. The Commission Regulation 466/2001  setting the maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs has been substantially amended many times to cope with recent understanding of mycotoxins contamination of foods and feeds. Currently, reports indicate that maximum levels for mycotoxins in foods are specified by the Commission Regulation EU 1881/2006 and the Commission Regulation EU 105/2010 as regards OTA, the Commission Regulation EU 165/2010 as regards aflatoxins, and the Commission Regulation EU 1126/2007 as regards Fusarium toxins [124-126]. Similarly, maximum levels for aflatoxins, ochratoxin A , patulin , and Fusarium toxin (fumonisin, deoxynivalenol, zearalenone) in different products: nuts, cereals, dried fruit, unprocessed cereals, processed cereal-based food, coffee, wine, spices, and liquorices are established. Many raw and processed foods not listed may also be contaminated by mycotoxins. Regarding total aflatoxins (i.e., sum of AFB1, AFB2, AFG1, and AFG2) in human food, EU maximum limits are 4 g/kg for peanuts and other oilseeds, tree nuts, dried fruits, cereals, and processed products thereof, intended for direct human consumption or use as ingredient in foodstuffs; 10 g/kg for tree nuts, dried fruits, maize and rice subjected to sorting, or other physical treatment, before human consumption as well as spices, dried figs, almonds, pistachios, apricot kernels, hazelnuts, and Brazil nuts intended for direct human consumption; and 15 g/kg for peanuts and other oilseeds, almonds, pistachios, apricot kernels, hazelnuts, and Brazil nuts subjected to sorting, or other physical treatment, before human consumption . The FDA action level is 20 g /kg for total AFs in peanuts, Brazil nuts, pistachios, and other foods for direct human consumption . Though all the limits set by the regulatory bodies followed the results of intensive research over the years, there is no doubt that constant review of these mycotoxins maximum limits in foods is important because of the development of mutant strains of fungi likely to produce more potent toxins.
|Toxin||Product||Maximum limit (µg/kg)|
|Aflatoxin||Peanuts, oilseeds, cereals, processed products||4|
|Tree nuts, dried fruits, maize, rice, spices, almonds, pistachios, hazel nuts||10|
|Fumonisins||Processed cereal-based foods
Infant baby foods
|Trichothecenes||Processed cereal-based foods
|Ochratoxin A||Processed cereal-based foods
Wine, grape juice, grape nectar/must
Roasted/ground coffee beans
Solid apple products
Spirit drink, cider
Biscuits, cereals, snacks
The EC and the FDA have at times variable mycotoxins limits for the same food commodity. This position need to be harmonized since maximum limits of mycotoxins in foods and feeds all bother on issues of human health and safety. This can be done by having inter agency committees to generally assess all maximum limits from various agencies and adopting a common position.
Strategies for prevention of mycotoxins
Many control strategies for mycotoxins contamination of foods have been proposed and implemented with varying degrees of successes. Suggested strategies include good agricultural practices (GAP), good manufacturing practices (GMP), biological control and transgenic approaches. These approaches are designed for mycotoxins control programs that will have economic impact as well as health improvement in the region. Many developing countries are gradually getting to know that reducing mycotoxin levels in foods will improve international trade advantages with a concomitant long-term health benefit to the local population. In most countries of the world, there is lack of understanding about mycotoxins contamination of foods. The focus on mycotoxin research should be centered on toxicity, exposure, mitigation impact and analytical aspects. A public private partnership to achieve this focus has been advocated. Under this arrangement, there should be a science driven body with volunteering scientists and public interest that will have a scientific discussion on the way forward for the control of mycotoxins in food and feeds. This is based on the fact that improvement of scientific knowledge in mycotoxins exposure and mitigation of contaminants in foods will ensure safer food products. Public health must be maintained through adversary on the scientific knowledge of mycotoxins and the extent of the impact of their potential risk to health. This scientific framework when developed should not be localized but exchanged and reviewed as frequently as possible to handle issues of analytical methods and emerging mycotoxins
Advocating good manufacturing practices is quit broad and it involves the physical food processing methods which are believed to reduce mycotoxins to a reseanable extent. Such methods include sorting, dehulling, milling, dewatering, enzymatic and microbial activities like malting processes in the brewery operations, fermentation etc. These are areas that require further investigations on how they reduce the risk of mycotoxins contamination.
Natural products have also been proposed to reduce mycotoxins. Eugenol has been found to inhibit aflatoxin production but does not affect fungal growth. It acts at the transcriptomic level, thereby blocking the biosynthetic pathway which occurs at the early stage. Many more natural products of plant or animal origin may be evaluated in this same direction.
Biotransformation can be used to mitigate mycotoxins by identifying the metabolites formed during biotransformation and verify that that the metabolites are non-toxic.
Education and extension services where regular programs on radio and televisions on mycotoxin hazards and discussion on the issue should feature regularly on daily newspapers and magazines has been proposed .
There are diverse opinions on the use of chemicals to control mycotoxins. Some researchers said seed fumigation with ethylene oxide and methyl formate was found to significantly reduce the incidence of fungi including toxigenic species on stored groundnuts and melon seeds. Bankole  and Kavita and Reddy  reported that sodium chloride (2.5, 5.0 and 10.0%), propionic acid (1.0, 2.5 and 5.0%), acetic acid (1.0, 2.5 and 5.0%) inhibited aflatoxin B1 production in A. flavus inoculated groundnuts and maize kept in gunny bags. FUMs contamination could be reduced by application of fungicides that have been used in control of Fusarium head blight, such as prochloraz, propiconazole, epoxyconazole, tebuconazole cyproconazole and azoxystrobin . On the other hand, application of fungicides has been shown to effectively control the AF producing Aspergillus species . Chemical reduction of FUM toxicity can be achieved through the use of allyl, benzyl and phenyl isothiocyanate in model solution and in food products . The BEA reduction varied from 10% to 65% in wheat flour and was dose-dependent with allyl isothiocyanate . A contrary opinion to all these indicate that chemical detoxification lead to potential toxic metabolites, reduction in nutritional value and changes to food products.
Biological control programs using microorganisms to detoxify mycotoxins are other measures that are widely used. The International Institute for Agricultural Research (IITA) has pioneered this technique in Nigeria, by the development of its product called Aflasafe. Aflasafe has proven successful and is being tried on a number of crops . Other reports of biological control is the introduction of a toxigenic strains of A. flavus and A. parasiticus to soil of developing crop resulting in 74.3 to 99.9% reduction in aflatoxin contamination of peanuts in the US  and 68-87% reduction in aflatoxin contamination in cotton seed . Saccharomyces cerevisiae reduced the AFB1 concentration in peanuts by 74.4% [137,138]. Control of FUM-producing fungi by endophytic bacteria has also been reported . Trichosporon mycotoxinivorans used as an OTA deactivator in broiler feeds has been recently reported . Lactic acid bacteria, such as Bifidobacterium bifidum and Lactobacillus rhamnosus, are suggested to be a promising biological control strategy for PAT in aqueous solutions . Fungal strains of Trichoderma have also been shown to control pathogenic fungi through mechanisms, such as competition for nutrients and space, fungistasis, antibiosis, rhizosphere modification, mycoparasitism, bio fertilization and the stimulation of plant-defense mechanisms .
Generally, mycotoxin contamination of agricultural products can be prevented using
1. Pre-harvest methods:
a. using resistant varieties
b. field management
c. use of biological and chemical agents
d. harvest management
2. Post-harvest methods:
a. improved drying methods
b. good storage conditions
c. use of natural and chemical agents
Other methods include
• Collection of a database of predominant fungi and mycotoxins in Nigeria.
• Construction of a Mycotoxin Occurrence Map to know the areas prone to Mycotoxin contamination.
• Establishment of a permanent culture collection center.
Good Agricultural practices (early planting and use of recommended crop production practices, irrigation to reduce drought stress, early harvesting, prevention of kernel damage during harvesting), Storage (adequate drying and proper storage below 13% moisture, and keeping storage facilities clean and dry) and Good Manufacturing Practices.
Mycotoxins contamination of food commodities remain a worldwide menace. Prevalence rate on foods and feeds differ from one region to another due to geographical factors that affect the growth of fungi and subsequent toxin production. Mycotoxins have occurred in many foods largely unknown to a number of consumers. Mycotoxins contamination of foods has adversely affected human health and international trade. Till now, not many countries have legislation on mycotoxin contamination of foods which does not mean absence of mycotoxins on foods in those countries. Several control strategies have been suggested through research but not fully implemented by the public. The use of media to create the much needed awareness is a good strategy for control and reduction of mycotoxin contamination of foods and feeds.
- Bryden WL (2009) Mycotoxins and mycotoxicoses: significance, occurrence and mitigation in the food chain. General, Applied and Systems Toxicology.
- Miller JD (1995) Fungi and mycotoxins in grain: implications for stored product research. Journal of Stored Products Research 31: 1-16.
- Wogan GN, Goldblatt LA (1969) Aflatoxin-Scientific Back ground, Control and Implications. Aflatoxin, Academic Press, New York-London, pp: 151-186.
- Kuiper-Goodman T, Scott PM (1989) Risk assessment of the mycotoxin ochratoxin A. Biomedical and environmental sciences: BES 2: 179-248.
- Castelo MM, Sumner SS, Bullerman LB (1998) Occurrence of fumonisins in corn-based food products. Journal of Food Protection 61: 704-707.
- Young JC, Fulcher RG, Hayhoe JH, Scott PM, Dexter JE (1984) Effect of milling and baking on deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) content of eastern Canadian wheats. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 32: 659-664.
- Richard JL (2007) Some major mycotoxins and their mycotoxicoses—An overview. International Journal of Food Microbiology 119: 3-10.
- Prelusky DB (1994) Residues in food products. In: Miller JD (eds.) Mycotoxins in grain, compounds other than aflatoxin. St. Paul, Minn, USA: Eagan Press, pp: 405-419.
- Binder EM, Tan LM, Chin LJ, Handl J, Richard J (2007) Worldwide occurrence of mycotoxins in commodities, feeds and feed ingredients. Animal Feed Science and Technology 137: 265-282.
- Streit E, Naehrer K, Rodrigues I, Schatzmayr G (2013) Mycotoxin occurrence in feed and feed raw materials worldwide: long‐term analysis with special focus on Europe and Asia. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 93: 2892-2899.
- Clarke R, Connolly L, Frizzell C, Elliott CT (2014) Cytotoxic assessment of the regulated, co-existing mycotoxins aflatoxin B1, fumonisin B1 and ochratoxin, in single, binary and tertiary mixtures. Toxicon 90: 70-81.
- Hussein HS, Brasel JM (2001) Toxicity, metabolism, and impact of mycotoxins on humans and animals. Toxicology 167: 101-134.
- World Health Organization, & International Agency for Research on Cancer (1993) Some naturally occurring substances: food items and constituents, heterocyclic aromatic amines and mycotoxins. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans 56.
- IARC (2002) IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans Fumonisin B1. IARC, Lyon, France.
- Murphy PA, Hendrich S, Landgren C, Bryant CM (2006) Food mycotoxins: an update. Journal of Food Science 71.
- Bullerman LB, Bianchini A (2007) Stability of mycotoxins during food processing. International Journal of Food Microbiology 119: 140-146.
- Kooprasertying P, Thamapoom M, Ratchanee H, Wanapa M (2016) Exposure assessment of aflatoxin in Thai peanut consumption. Cogent Food and Agriculture 2: 1204-683.
- Bryden WL (2012) Mycotoxin contamination of the feed supply chain: Implications for animal productivity and feed security. Animal Feed Science and Technology 173: 134-158.
- Marin S, Ramos AJ, Cano-Sancho G, Sanchis V (2013) Mycotoxins: occurrence, toxicology, and exposure assessment. Food and Chemical Toxicology 60: 218-237.
- Speijers GJA, Speijers MHM (2004) Combined toxic effects of mycotoxins. Toxicology letters 153: 91-98.
- Molinie A, Faucet V, Castegnaro M, Pfohl-Leszkowicz A (2005) Analysis of some breakfast cereals on the French market for their contents of ochratoxin A, citrinin and fumonisin B1: development of a method for simultaneous extraction of ochratoxin A and citrinin. Food Chemistry 92: 391-400.
- Zinedine A, Brera C, Elakhdari S, Catano C, Debegnach F, et al. (2006) Natural occurrence of mycotoxins in cereals and spices commercialized in Morocco. Food Control 17: 868-874.
- Martins ML, Martins HM, Bernardo F (2001) Aflatoxins in spices marketed in Portugal. Food Additives and Contaminants 18: 315-319.
- Adejumo TO, Adejoro DO (2014) Incidence of aflatoxins, fumonisins, trichothecenes and ochratoxins in Nigerian foods and possible intervention strategies. Food Science and Quality Management 31: 127-146.
- Ashiq S (2015) Natural occurrence of mycotoxins in food and feed: Pakistan perspective. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 14: 159-175.
- Yin YN, Yan LY, Jiang JH, Ma ZH (2008) Biological control of aflatoxin contamination of crops. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B 9: 787-792
- Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives [JECFA] (1998) Safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants in food: Aflatoxin. Forty-ninth Meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, WHO Food Additives Series 40: 359-469.
- ROC (Reports on Carcinogens) (2003) Aflatoxins. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available from: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roceleventh/profiles/s006afla.pdf. Accessed on: February 10, 2011.
- Mycotoxins and mycotoxicoses: significance, occurrence and mitigation in the food chain. General, Applied and Systems Toxicology.
- Fallah AA (2010) Assessment of aflatoxin M1 contamination in pasteurized and UHT milk marketed in central part of Iran. Food and Chemical Toxicology 48: 988-991.
- Frobish RA, Bradley BD, Wagner DD, Long-Bradley PE, Hairstone H, et al. (1986) Aflatoxin residues in milk of dairy cows after ingestion of naturally contaminated grain. Journal of Food Protection 49: 781-785.
- Bakirci I (2001) A study on the occurrence of aflatoxin M 1 in milk and milk products produced in Van province of Turkey. Food control 12: 47-51.
- Gurbay AS, Engin AB, Çaglayan A, Sahin G (2006) Aflatoxin M1 levels in Commonly consumed cheese and yoghurt samples in Ankara, Turkey. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 45: 449-459.
- Brackett RE, Marth EH (1982) Association of aflatoxin M 1 with casein. Zeitschrift für Lebensmitteluntersuchung und-Forschung A 174: 439-441.
- Barbiroli A, Bonomi F, Benedetti S, Mannino S, Monti L, et al. (2007) Binding of Aflatoxin M1 to Different Protein Fractions in Ovine and Caprine Milk. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 532-540.
- Govaris A, Roussi V, Koidis PA, Botsoglou NA (2001) Distribution and stability of aflatoxin M1 during processing, ripening and storage of Telemes cheese. Food Additives and Contaminants 18: 437-443.
- Fungi and mycotoxins in grain: implications for stored product research. Journal of Stored Products Research 31: 1-16.
- Risk assessment of the mycotoxin ochratoxin A. Biomedical and environmental sciences: BES 2: 179-248.
- Occurrence of fumonisins in corn-based food products. Journal of Food Protection 61: 704-707.
- Dragacci S, Gleizes E, Fremy JM, Candlish AAG (1995) Use of immunoaffinity chromatography as a purification step for the determination of aflatoxin M1 in cheeses. Food Additives & Contaminants 12: 59-65.
- Martins ML, Martins HM (2000) Aflatoxin M1 in raw and ultra-high temperature treated milk commercialized in Portugal. Food Additives and Contaminants 17: 871- 874.
- Elgerbi AM, Aidoo KE, Candlish AAG, Tester RF (2004) Occurrence of aflatoxin M1 in randomly selected North African milk and cheese samples. Food Additives and Contaminants 21: 592-597.
- Oliveira CA, Rosmaninho J, Rosim R (2006) Aflatoxin M 1 and cyclopiazonic acid in fluid milk traded in São Paulo, Brazil. Food Additives and Contaminants 23: 196-201.
- Torkar KG, Vengušt A (2008) The presence of yeasts, moulds and aflatoxin M 1 in raw milk and cheese in Slovenia. Food Control 19: 570-577.
- Van der MKJ, Steyn PS, Fourie L, Scott DB, Theron JJ (1965) Ochratoxin A, a toxic metabolite produced by Aspergillus ochraceus Wilh. Nature 205: 1112-1113.
- Adeyeye SAO (2016) Fungal mycotoxins in foods: A review. Cogent Food and Agriculture.
- Bayman P, Baker JL (2006) Ochratoxins: A global perspective. Mycopathologia 162: 215-223.
- Jeswal P, Kumar D (2015) Mycobiota and natural incidence of aflatoxins, ochratoxin A, and citrinin in Indian spices confirmed by LC-MS/MS. International Journal of Microbiology 2015: 242-246.
- Cark HA, Snedeker SM (2006) Ochratoxin A: its cancer risk and potential for exposure. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health B 9: 265-296.
- Wolff J, Bresch H, Cholmakov-Bodechtel C, Engel G, Garais M, et al. (2000) Ochratoxin A: Contamination of foods and consumer exposure. Archive fur Lebensmittelhygiene 51: 181-128.
- Bennett JW, Klich M (2003) Mycotoxins. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 16: 497-516.
- Scudamore KA, Banks J, MacDonald SJ (2003) Fate of ochratoxin A in the processing of whole wheat grains during milling and bread production. Food Additives and Contaminants 20: 1153-1163.
- Abrunhosa L, Robert R, Paterson M, Venâncio A (2010) Biodegradation of Ochratoxin A for food and feed decontamination. Toxins, 2: 1078-1099.
- Birkinshaw JH, Michael SE, Bracken A, Raistrick H (1943) Patulin in the common cold collaborative research on a derivative of Penicillium patulum Bainier. II. Biochemistry and Chemistry. Lancet 245: 625.
- Baer, K, Devlieghere F, Flyps H, Oosterlinck M, Ahmed MM, et al. (2007) Influence of storage conditions of apples on growth and patulin production by Penicillium expansum. International Journal of Food Microbiology 119: 170-181.
- Moss MO (2008) Fungi, quality and safety issues in fresh fruits and vegetables. Journal of Applied Microbiology 104: 1239-1243.
- Trucksess MW, Scott PM (2008) Mycotoxins in botanicals and dried fruits: A review. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A 25: 181-192.
- Moake MM, Padilla-Zakour OI, Worobo RW (2005) Comprehensive Review of Patulin Control Methods in Foods. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 1: 8-21.
- Sweeney MJ, Dobson ADW (1998) Mycotoxin production by Aspergillus, Fusarium and Penicillium species. International Journal of Food Microbiology 43: 141-158.
- Wan-Norashima WM, Abdulamir AS, Abu BF, Son R, Norhafniza A (2009) The health and toxic adverse effects of Fusarium fungal mycotoxins, fumonisins on human population. American Journal of Infectious Diseases 5: 273-281.
- Yazar S, Omurtag GZ (2008) Fumonisins, trichothecenes and zearalenone in cereals. International Journal of Molecular Science 9: 2062-2090.
- Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (2003) Mycotoxins: Risks in Plant, Animal and Human Systems. Task Force, USA.
- Wan Norhasima WM, Abdulamir AS, Abu Bakar F, Son R, Norhafniza A (2009) The health and toxic adverse effects of Fusarium fungal mycotoxin, fumonisins, on human population. American Journal of Infectious Diseases 5: 273-281.
- Logrieco A, Moretti A, Castella G, Kostecki M, Golinski P, et al. (1998) Beauvericin production by Fusarium species. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 3084-3088.
- Pitt JI (2000) Toxigenic fungi and mycotoxins. Br Med Bull 56: 184-192.
- Creppy EE (2002) Update of survey, regulation and toxic effects of mycotoxins in Europe. Toxicol. Lett 127: 19-28.
- Effect of milling and baking on deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin) content of eastern Canadian wheats. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 32: 659-664.
- Bankole SA, Adebanjo A (2003) Mycotoxins in food in West Africa: current situation and possibilities of controlling it. African Journal of Biotechnology 2: 254-263
- Ficheux AS, Sibiril Y, le Garrec R, Parent-Massin D (2012) In vitro myelotoxicity assessment of the emerging mycotoxins Beauvericin, Enniatin b and Moniliformin on human hematopoietic progenitors. Toxicon 59: 182-191.
- Darocha MEB, da Freire FCO, Maia FEF, Guedes MIF, Rondina D (2014) Mycotoxins and their effects on human and animal health. Food Control 36: 159-165.
- Folazi A, Sireli UT (2013) Occurrence of aflatoxins in food. In: Razzaghi-Abyaneh M (eds.) Aflatoxins- Recent Advances and Future Prospects. Ankara, Turkey.
- Oleivera PM, Zannin E, Arendt EK (2014) Cereal fungal infections, mycotoxins and lactic acid bacteria mediated bio protective from crop farming to cereal products. Food Microbiology 37: 28-95.
- Hohn TM, Van Middles WF (1986) Purification and characterization of the sesquiterpene cyclase trichodiene synthase from Fusarium sporotrichioides. Arch Biochem Biophys 251: 756-761.
- Desjardins AE, Hohn TM, McCormick SP (1993) Trichothecene biosynthesis in Fusarium species: chemistry, genetics and significance. Microbiol Rev 57: 595-604.
- Alexander NJ, Hohn TM, McCormick SP (1998) The TRI11 gene of Fusarium sporotrichioides encodes a cytochrome P-450 monooxygenase required for the C-15 hydroxylation in trichothecene biosynthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 221-225.
- Desjardins AE, Plattner RD, Proctor RH (1996) Linkage among genes responsible for fumonisin biosynthesis in Gibberella fujikuroi mating population A. Appl Environ Microbiol 62: 2571-2576.
- Bennett JW, Papa KE (1988) The aflatoxigenic Aspergillus species. Adv. Plant Pathol 6: 263-280
- Trail F, Mahanti N, Linz JE (1995) Molecular biology of aflatoxin biosynthesis. Microbiology 141: 755-765.
- Minto RE, Townsend CA (1997) Enzymology and molecular biology of aflatoxin biosynthesis. Chem. Rev 97: 2537-2552.
- Bennett JW, Chang PK, Bhatnagar D (1997) One gene to whole pathway: The role of norsolorinic acid in aflatoxin research. Adv Appl Microbiol 45: 1-15.
- Woloshuk CP, Prieto R (1998) Genetic organization and function of the aflatoxin B1 biosynthetic genes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 160: 169-176.
- Prieto R, Yousibova GL, Woloshuk CP (1996) Identification of aflatoxin biosynthetic genes by genetic complementation in an Aspergillus flavus mutant lacking the aflatoxin gene cluster. Appl Environ Microbiol 62: 3567-3571.
- Yabe K, Matsushima KI, Koyama T, Hamasaki T (1998) Purification and characterization of O-methyltransferase I involved in conversion of demethylsterigmatocystin to sterigmatocystin and of dihydrodemethyl-sterigmatocystin to dihydrosterigmatocystin during aflatoxin biosynthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 166-171.
- Machinski M (2012) Daily intake estimates of fumonisins in corn-based food products in the population of Parana. Food Control 26: 614-618.
- Coker RD (1999) Aflatoxin: past, present and future. Tropical Science 21: 143-162.
- Dalezios JL, Hsieh DPH, Wogan GN (1973) Excretion and metabolism of orally administered aflatoxin B1 by rhesus monkeys. Food and Cosmetic Toxicology 11: 605-616.
- Yunus AW, Awad WA, Kroger S, Zentek J, Bohm J (2010) In vitro aflatoxin B1 exposure decreases response to carbamylcholine in the jejunal epithelium of broilers. Poultry Science 89: 1372-1378.
- Wilson DM, Mubatanhema W, Jurjevic Z (2002) Biology and ecology of mycotoxicogeni Aspergillus species as related to economic and health concerns. Advances in Experimental Medical Biology 504: 3-17.
- Hsieh, DPH, Wong JJ (1994) Pharmacokinetics and excretion of aflatoxins. In: Eaton, DL, Groopman JD (eds.) The toxicology of aflatoxins: human health, veterinary and agricultural significance. New York, pp: 73-88.
- Avantaggiato G, Havenaar R, Visconti A (2004) Evaluation of the intestinal absorption of deoxynivalenol and nivalenol by an in vitro gastrointestinal model, and the binding efficacy of activated carbon and other adsorbent materials. Food Chemistry and Toxicology 42: 817-824.
- Ben-Ami R, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP (2010) Enemy of the (immunosuppressed) state: an update on the pathogenesis of Aspergillus fumigatus infection. British Journal of Haematology 150: 406-417.
- Huffman J, Gerber R, Du L (2010) Recent advancements in the biosynthetic mechanisms for polyketide-derived mycotoxins. Biopolymers 93: 764-776.
- Meggs WJ (2009) Epidemics of mold poisoning past and present. Toxicol of Industrial Health 25: 571-576.
- Essigmann JM, Croy RG, Bennett RA, Wogan GN (1982) Metabolic activation of aflatoxin B1: patterns of DNA adduct formation, removal, and excretion in relation to carcinogenesis. Drug Metabolism Review 13: 581-602.
- Klich MA (2009) Health effects of Aspergillus in food and air. Toxicology in Industrial Health 25: 657-67.
- Baertsch SW, Raney KD, Shimada T, Harris TM, Guengerich FP (1989) Comparison of rates of enzymatic oxidation of aflatoxin B1, aflatoxin G1, and sterigmatocystin and activities of the epoxides in forming guanyl-N7 adducts and inducing different genetic responses. Chemical Research and Toxicology 2: 114-122.
- Kremer A, Westrich L, Li SM (2007) A 7-dimethylallyltryptophan synthase from Aspergillus fumigatus: overproduction, purification and biochemical characterization. Microbiology 153: 3409-3416.
- Magan N, Aldred D, Mylona K, Lambert RJ (2010) Limiting mycotoxins in stored wheat. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 27: 644-650.
- Autrup H, Essigmann JM, Croy RG, Trump BF, Wogan GN, et al. (1979) Metabolism of aflatoxin B1-guanine adduct and hepatitis B virus infection in areas with different liver cancer incidence in Kenya. Cancer Research 47: 3430-3433.
- Smith CA, Woloshuk CP, Robertson D, Payne GA (2007) Silencing of the Aflatoxin Gene Cluster in a Diploid Strain of Aspergillus flavus Is Suppressed by Ectopic aflR Expression. Genetics 176: 2077-2086.
- Pestka JJ, Bondy GS (1990) Alteration of immune function following dietary mycotoxin exposure. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 68: 1009-1016.
- Schoenhard GL, Hendricks JD, Nixon JE, Lee DJ, Wales JH, et al. (1981) Aflatoxicol-induced hepatocellular carcinoma in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) and synergistic effects of cyclopropenoid fatty acids. Cancer Research 41: 1011-1014.
- Pasquali M, Giraud F, Lasserre JP, Planchon S, Hoffmann L, et al. (2010) Toxin induction and protein extraction from Fusarium spp. cultures for proteomic studies. J vis Exp 36: e1690.
- Coulombe RA, Sharma RP (1985) Clearance and excretion of intratracheally and orally administered aflatoxin B1 in the rat. Food Chemistry and Toxicology 23: 827-830.
- Probs C, Njapau H, Cotty PJ (2007) Outbreak of an Acute Aflatoxicosis in Kenya in 2004: Identification of the Causal Agent. Applied Environmental Microbiology 73: 2762-2764.
- Miller JD, Trenholm ML (1994) Mycotoxins in grain: compounds other than aflatoxin. USA: Eagan Press.
- Mehan VK, McDonald D, Haravu LJ, Jayanthi S (1991) The groundnut aflatoxin problem, review and literature database. Patancheru, AP India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics.
- Wild CP, Jiang YZ, Allen SJ, Jansen LAM, Hall AJ, et al. (1990) Aflatoxin-albumin adducts in human sera from different regions of the world. Carcinogenesis 11: 2271-2274.
- Cardwell KF (2000) Mycotoxin contamination of foods in Africa: Antinutritional factors. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 21: 4.
- Hendrickse RG (1991) Clinical implications of food contamination by aflatoxins. Ann Acad Med 20: 84-90.
- Adhikari M, Ramjee G, Berjak P (1994) Aflatoxin, kwashiorkor, and morbidity. Natural Toxins 2: 1-3.
- Ramjee G, Berjak P, Adhikari M, Dutton MF (1992) Aflatoxins and kwashiorkor in Durban, South Africa. Ann Trop Paediatr 12: 241-247.
- Wild CP, Hall AJ (1996) Epidemiology of mycotoxin-related disease. In: Howard S, Miller JD (eds.) The Mycota VI. Human and animal relationships. Berlin, Springer- Verlag, pp: 213-225.
- Linsell CA, Peers FG (1977) Aflatoxin and liver cell cancer. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 71: 471-3.
- Peers F, Bosch X, Kaldor J, Linsell A, Pluijment M (1987) Aflatoxin exposure, hepatitis B virus infection and liver cancer in Swaziland. Int J Cancer 39: 545-53.
- Van Rensburg SJ, Cook-Mozaffari P, Van Schalkwyk DJ, Van der Watt JJ, Vincent TJ, et al. (1985) Hepatocellular carcinoma and dietary aflatoxin in Mozambique and Transkei. Br J Cancer 51: 713-726.
- Marasas WFO (1988) Medical relevance of mycotoxins in Southern Africa. Microbiologie-Aliments-Nutrition 6: 1-5.
- Marasas WFO (1996) Fumonisins: history, worldwide occurrence and impact. In: Jackson LS, DeVries JW, Bullerman LB (eds.) Fumonisins in food. New York: Plenum Press: 1-18.
- Bhat RV, Beedu SR, Ramakrishna Y, Munshi KL (1989) Outbreak of trichothecene mycotoxicosis associated with consumption of mould-damaged wheat in Kashmir Valley, India. Lancet 1: 35-37.
- Beardall JM, Miller JD (1994) Diseases in humans with mycotoxins as possible causes. In: Miller JD, Trenholm HL, (eds.) Mycotoxins in grain. St. Paul, Minn, USA: Eagan Press 487-540.
- Hans PE, Schothorst RC, Jonker MA (2007) Regulations relating to mycotoxins in food. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 389: 147-157.
- Wood GE (1992) Mycotoxins in foods and feeds in the United States Journal of Animal Science 70: 3941-3949.
- Commission Regulation (EC) 466/2001 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union 2001: L77 1-13
- Commission Regulation (EC) 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union 2006: L364 5-24.
- Commission Regulation (EC) 1126/2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs as regards Fusarium toxinsin maize and maize products Official Journal of the European Communities 2007: 14-17.
- Commission Regulation (EU) 105/2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs as regards ochratoxin A. Official Journal of the European Union 2010: L35 7-8.
- FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) Guidance for industry and FDA: Advisory levels for deoxynivalenol (DON) in finished wheat products for human consumption and grains and grain by-products used for animal feed (June 29 2010: Revised July 7, 2010) Available online: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/UCM217558.pdf Accessed on December 3, 2015.
- Bankole SA (1996) Effect of ethylene oxide and methyl formate fumigation on seeds mycoflora and germination of some stored oil seeds in Nigeria. Crop Res 11: 224-227.
- Kavita W, Reddy MU (2000) Effect of chemicals on aflatoxin B1 production, germination and viability in maize and groundnuts. Journal of Research ANGRAU 28: 57-64.
- Haidukowski M, Pascale M, Perrone G, Pancaldi D, Campagna C, et al. (2005) Effect of fungicides on the development of Fusarium head blight, yield and deoxynivalenol accumulation in wheat inoculated under field conditions with Fusarium graminearum and Fusarium culmorum. J Sci Food Agric 85: 191-198.
- Ni X, Streett DA (2005) Modulation of water activity on fungicide effect on Aspergillus niger growth in Sabouraud dextrose agar medium. Lett Appl Microbiol 41: 428-433.
- Azaiez I, Meca G, Manyes L, Luciano FB, Fernández FM (2012) Study of the chemical reduction of the fumonisins toxicity using allyl, benzyl and phenyl isothiocyanate in model solution and in food products. Toxicon 12: 43- 45.
- Meca G, Luciano FB, Zhou T, Tsao R, Manes J (2012) Chemical reduction of the mycotoxin beauvericin using allyl isothiocyanate. Food Chem Toxicol 50: 1755-1762.
- Hussaini A (2013) Mycotoxin and Food Safety in Developing Countries.
- Dorne JW, Cole RJ (2002) Effect of application of nontoxigenic strain of Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus on subsequent aflatoxin contamination of peanuts in storage. J Stored Prod Res 38: 329-339.
- Cotty PJ (1994) Influence of field application of an aflatoxigenic strain of Aspergillus flavus on the populations of A. flavus infecting cotton bolls and on aflatoxin content of cottonseed. Phytopathology 84: 1270-1277.
- Prado G, Madeira JE, Morais VA, Oliveira MS, Souza RA, et al. (2011) Reduction of aflatoxin B1 in stored peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Food Prot 74: 1003-1006.
- Armando MR, Dogi CA, Rosa CA, Dalcero AM, Cavaglieri LR (2012) Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains and the reduction of Aspergillus parasiticus growth and aflatoxin B1 production at different interacting environmental conditions, in vitro. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 29: 1443-1449.
- Bacon CW, Yates IE, Hinton DM, Meredith F (2001) Biological control of Fusarium moniliforme in maize. Environ Health Perspect 109: 325-332.
- Hanif NQ, Muhammad G, Muhammad K, Tahira I, Raja GK (2012) Reduction of ochratoxin A in broiler serum and tissues by Trichosporon mycotoxinivorans. Res Vet Sci 93: 795-797.
- Hatab S, Yue T, Mohamad O (2012) Reduction of patulin in aqueous solution by lactic acid bacteria. J Food Sci 77: 238-241.
- Benítez T, Ana M, Rincon M, Carmen LA, Codon C (2004) Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. Int Microbiol 7: 249-260.
Citation: Ukwuru MU, Ohaegbu CG, Muritala A (2018) An Overview of Mycotoxin Contamination of Foods and Feeds. J Biochem Microb Toxicol 1: 101.
Copyright: © 2018 Ukwuru MU, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Select your language of interest to view the total content in your interested language
Share This Article
Open Access Journals
- Total views: 6045
- [From(publication date): 0-2017 - May 21, 2022]
- Breakdown by view type
- HTML page views: 5382
- PDF downloads: 663