Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)

Accuracy of cyst vs. solid diagnosis in the breast using quantitative transmission (QT) ultrasound

International Conference on Medical Imaging & Diagnosis

Elaine Iuanow, Kathleen Smith, Nancy A Obuchowski, Jennifer Bullen and John C Klock

Cleveland Clinic Foundation, USA

ScientificTracks Abstracts: OMICS J Radiol

DOI: 10.4172/2167-7964.C1.009

Abstract
We present the results of a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) study using an emerging ultrasound technology, quantitative transmission (QT) ultrasound. We present the readers the accuracy in determining whether a breast lesion is a cyst versus a solid using QT ultrasound. Digital mammograms (XRM) and QT ultrasound imaging were selected from the QT ultrasound library of images. All solid cases had ground truth pathology. Hand held ultrasound images were used as ground truth for cysts. Thirteen readers performed blinded reading of 32 cases (15 solids and 17 cysts) using XRM+QT, assigning both a confidence score (0-100) and a binary classification (solid/cyst) to classify lesions. A 95% percentile bootstrap confidence interval (CI) was computed for the mean readers��? area under the ROC curve, sensitivity (proportion of solids correctly classified as solid) and specificity (proportion of cysts correctly classified as cysts). Results show that when a speed of sound measurement >1571 m/s was used to indicate a solid, mean sensitivity and specificity of QT ultrasound were 0.75 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.92) and 0.85 (CI: 0.67, 1.00), respectively. Using the readers��? binary classifications with XRM+QT, mean sensitivity and specificity were 0.95 (CI: 0.87, 1.00) and 0.84 (CI: 0.66, 0.98), respectively. When the readers��? confidence scores with XRM+QT were used to distinguish solids versus cysts, mean ROC area was 0.923 (CI: 0.830, 0.988). QT ultrasound is an emerging ultrasound technology that demonstrates high accuracy in distinguishing cyst versus solid lesions in the breast.
Biography

Elaine Iuanow has graduated with her Medical degree from Tuft’s University School of Medicine and has completed her Fellowship in Breast Imaging at Brigham and Women’s/Faulkner-Sagoff Breast Center in Boston, MA. She is the Chief Medical Officer working with the research and development team at QT Ultrasound Labs, a novel breast ultrasound development company based in the San Francisco Bay Area. She brings her significant expertise in Breast Imaging as a Board Certified Radiologist with experience in administering world class care at premier medical institutions in the United States. Her research interests include breast ultrasound, entrepreneurship in health care delivery models, providing care to underserved women, breast disease in female and male patients, and advocacy regarding preventative breast health on the local, national and global arenas.

Email: elaine.iuanow@qtultrasound.com

Top