Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 5125

Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change received 5125 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
  • CAS Source Index (CASSI)
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Romeo
  • Online Access to Research in the Environment (OARE)
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • JournalTOCs
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
  • Access to Global Online Research in Agriculture (AGORA)
  • Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI)
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Proquest Summons
  • SWB online catalog
  • Publons
  • Euro Pub
  • ICMJE
Share This Page

Strategic soil fertility management for replicable technologies in Rwanda

3rd International Conference on Earth Science & Climate Change

Rushemuka Pascal

Accepted Abstracts: J Earth Sci Clim Change

DOI: 10.4172/2157-7617.S1.016

Abstract
In the complex landscapes/soilscapes like those found in the highlands of Rwanda, soil-specific fertility management and replicable technology development is a crucial issue. A pot experiment was undertaken to demonstrate the need to match soil type with appropriate inputs and the strategy to extrapolate developed technologies to analogous soil types. Using a multi-scale and nested hierarchy land system reasoning, four soil types occurring in different land units of the same watershed and eight fertilizer treatments were considered. The plant test was Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Results showed significant differences between soil types and fertilizer treatments (p≤0.001). This confirmed the requirement of tailoring soil fertility management inputs to specific soil types in specific land positions/land units. In Akavuguto, watershed case study, both Urusenyi (Entisols) on hill tops and Inombe (Ultisols) on plateaus, the effect of lime was not significant and the control in both soil types still produced relatively high biomass yields. In Umuyugu/Mugugu (Oxisols) on back slope and Nyiramugengeri (Histosols) in the valley bottom, the effect of lime was spectacular. The response in all treatments without lime was insignificant and in the same category of mean separation with the control. In these two soil types, the best treatment was the combination of lime, farmyard manure and fertilizers. The difference in soil suitability was mainly explained by different parent materials in the different land units. The conclusion was that within the same agro-ecological zones, farmers? nomenclature for land units and soil types can be an effective communication framework to develop soil-specific technologies and transfer them into analogous soil types.
Biography
Relevant Topics
Top