Spanish 
Chinese 
Russian 
German 
French 
Japanese 
Portuguese 
Hindi Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.
Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 925
Otolaryngology: Open Access received 925 citations as per Google Scholar report
Otolaryngology: Open Access peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
- Index Copernicus
- Google Scholar
- Sherpa Romeo
- Open J Gate
- Genamics JournalSeek
- RefSeek
- Hamdard University
- EBSCO A-Z
- OCLC- WorldCat
- Publons
- Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
- ICMJE
Useful Links
Recommended Journals
Related Subjects
Share This Page
A comparison between two methods of face-lift surgery in nine cadavers: SMAS (superficial musculoaponeurotic system) versus MACS (minimal access cranial suspension)
Global Summit and Medicare Expo on Head & Neck Surgery
Mohammad Mahdi Salem, Mohammadi S, Ahmadi A, Safdarian M and Ilkhani S
Rasoul Akram Hospital, Iran
Posters-Accepted Abstracts: Otolaryngol (Sunnyvale)
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to compare the average amounts of facial skin and muscle lifting in two different face-lift methods, superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) plication and minimal access cranial suspension (MACS), to evaluate the effectiveness of each method in facial excursion. Methods: Thirty-six face-lift surgeries were performed on nine cadavers between October and December 2010. Both SMAS and MACS surgeries were done on each side of the cadaver faces. The average amounts of skin and muscle lifting up and out in three defined anatomical landmarks were compared between the two methods, SMAS plication and MACS lift procedure. Results: Nine fresh cadavers with the mean age of 53�±6.7 years entered the study. Seven (77.8%) were males and two (22.2%) were females. The average amounts of lifting of the anatomical landmarks up and out were significantly greater in the SMAS plication method compared to the MACS lift procedure (P values<0.05), whereas facial symmetry was not significantly different between the two methods. Conclusion: The overall amounts of facial skin and muscle lifting by the SMAS plication method were greater than the MACS lift procedure. However, it does not justify ignoring the benefits of the MACS lift procedure in terms of less invasiveness and quicker recovery.Biography
Email: mmsalem2@gmail.com
