Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 7718

Journal of Bioremediation & Biodegradation received 7718 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Bioremediation & Biodegradation peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
  • CAS Source Index (CASSI)
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Romeo
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Academic Keys
  • JournalTOCs
  • ResearchBible
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
  • Access to Global Online Research in Agriculture (AGORA)
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • SWB online catalog
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • MIAR
  • ICMJE
Share This Page

Exergoeconomic study of gas turbine combined power cycle with biofuel

6th World Congress on Biofuels and Bioenergy

Saeid Soltani

University of Tabriz, Iran

Posters & Accepted Abstracts: J Bioremediat Biodegrad

DOI: 10.4172/2155-6199-C1-009

Abstract
Biomass energy has the potential to replace fossil fuels despite its lower heat value. Fog cooling and steam injection, as well as adding steam turbine cycles to gas turbine cycles, can enhance the performance of power generation systems. Here, the results are reported of energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of two proposed biomass (wood) integrated steam injection cycles and combined power cycles. Their performances are assessed for similar sets of conditions. The thermodynamic analyses demonstrate that at lower values of compressor pressure ratio the combined cycle has a higher efficiency but at higher values of pressure ratio the steam injection plant is advantageous. For the same conditions, the steam injection plant exhibits a higher net power output. The exergoeconomic analyses show that electricity and component costs for the combined cycle are higher than for the steam injection plant. The exergy destruction rate and its cost are higher at lower compressor pressure ratios for the steam injection cycle, and at higher pressure ratios for the combined cycle. The exergy loss rate and its cost are higher for the combined cycle at all pressure ratios. Also the steam injection cycle is more cost effective due to its lower relative cost difference.
Biography
Top