Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
Google Scholar citation report
Journal of Ecosystem & Ecography peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
  • CAS Source Index (CASSI)
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Romeo
  • Online Access to Research in the Environment (OARE)
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Ulrich's Periodicals Directory
  • Access to Global Online Research in Agriculture (AGORA)
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • EBSCO A-Z
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • SWB online catalog
  • Virtual Library of Biology (vifabio)
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
Share This Page

Short-term effects of stream and riparian restoration on wildlife

World Conference on Ecology

James T Anderson, Kathryn R McCoard and Anthony A Billings

West Virginia University, USA

Posters & Accepted Abstracts: J Ecosyst Ecography

DOI: 10.4172/2157-7625-C1-033

Abstract
Restoration of riparian zones, as part of stream restoration, can improve water quality and aquatic life by decreasing nutrient and sediment loads into streams. Although in-stream monitoring is often a focus for evaluating restoration success, fewer studies have emphasized potential short-term impacts of the disturbance on riparian wildlife. We monitored riparian wildlife responses during a natural stream channel design restoration project along a 1,100 m restoration reach (RR) of the Cacapon River, West Virginia, USA. Reference (RS) and control (CS) sites were located upstream and downstream of the RR. Small mammal trapping, bird counts, frog call surveys, and vegetation surveys were conducted pre- and post-restoration. We observed six species of small mammals, 79 species of birds, eight species of anurans, and 96 species of plants. Small mammal abundance was higher in CS than RR post-impact. Small mammal richness, diversity, or evenness did not differ between sites or time periods. Overall bird abundance, richness, and diversity were higher in the RR compared to CS post-impact. No effect on passerine diversity metrics, the abundances of each of the five most common bird species, or anuran richness was observed. Vegetative diversity metrics tended to be higher in the RS compared to the CS or RR for native species. Community composition of both plants and wildlife exhibited minor variations between pre- to post- monitoring. Riparian restoration does influence riparian wildlife, but overall there were few negative effects and we anticipate observing increasing riparian biodiversity as post-restoration time length increases and the riparian zone matures. jim.anderson@mail.wvu.edu
Biography
Relevant Topics

http://sacs17.amberton.edu/

Top