Harm Minimization Strategies And Addiction Therapy | 18040
ISSN: 2155-6105

Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy
Open Access

Like us on:

Our Group organises 3000+ Global Conferenceseries Events every year across USA, Europe & Asia with support from 1000 more scientific Societies and Publishes 700+ Open Access Journals which contains over 50000 eminent personalities, reputed scientists as editorial board members.

Open Access Journals gaining more Readers and Citations
700 Journals and 15,000,000 Readers Each Journal is getting 25,000+ Readers

This Readership is 10 times more when compared to other Subscription Journals (Source: Google Analytics)
Google Scholar citation report
Citations : 2464

Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy received 2464 citations as per Google Scholar report

Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
  • CAS Source Index (CASSI)
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Romeo
  • Open J Gate
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Academic Keys
  • JournalTOCs
  • SafetyLit
  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)
  • Electronic Journals Library
  • RefSeek
  • Hamdard University
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • SWB online catalog
  • Virtual Library of Biology (vifabio)
  • Publons
  • Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research
  • Euro Pub
Share This Page

Harm minimization strategies and addiction therapy

3rd International Conference and Exhibition on Addiction Research & Therapy

Cynthia Stuhlmiller

Plenary Session: J Addict Res Ther

DOI: 10.4172/2155-6105.S1.015

H arm minimization is the long standing philosophy underpinning national and state drug strategies in Australia. This public health approach is founded on three pillars of 1) reducing the supply of harmful substances, 2) reducing the demand for their use, and 3) reducing the health-related harm associated with use of drugs. To date, supply reduction has been shown to be complicated, expensive, and ineffective. Demand reduction, or programs aimed to discourage people from wanting drugs, has been shown to work best for those who need them least. There is however strong evidence to support the beneficial effects of harm reduction approaches in decreasing morbidity and mortality by abating spread of HIV and hepatitis C infection. Harm reduction focuses first on reducing the negative consequences of drug use, rather than promoting abstinence. From this paradigm it is argued that programs should be available to help keep addicted people as safe as possible. Yet to what extend has this approach treated addition or reduced the harm created by continuation of addiction and its progression A new recovery approach for addictions is taking hold in United States, United Kingdom and now Australia. New recovery recognises that interventions to combat complex behavioural difficulties need more holistic responses, and far better co-ordination of a range of government and community services, particularly at grass-roots levels. Recovery pathways are contingent upon matters such as housing, work, access to education, child welfare, protection of vulnerable people, health services more generally and the ability to meaningfully participate in communities. In Australia, new recovery has been met with controversy by the harm reduction community. This presentation will outline the key issues and concerns of harm reduction and new recovery as they relate to addition therapy and engage the participants in debate. A case example of a needle syringe program in Australia will be used to highlight the relevant points

Cynthia Stuhlmiller is Professor of Rural Nursing at the University of New England, School of Health in Armidale, Australia. She has been a joint appointment professor for over 17 years at 8 Universities in 5 countries. Her clinical work is in mental health and CBT self-help applications